誰在扯3D的後腿？不是所有的2D影片都適合拿來製作3D內容。

q2262101 · 發表於 2011-8-27 15:20:44

反正就是技術還沒純熟
就有一大堆片商打著3D噱頭出來吸引人
其實一些電影看2D的還比3D好看- -

530wj · 發表於 2011-9-15 01:56:13

德国人非常热衷于彻头彻尾的假2D转3D，已经看见不少这样的德版蓝光了，非常bs这样的行为啊，这是干什么呢？

yellmaster · 發表於 2011-9-16 11:32:43

對消費者而言，家用3D還不完善，不管是硬體還是軟體，等吧，要賺消費者的錢，廠商總要端出牛肉才行．

lee1972 · 發表於 2012-7-26 10:34:51

jk111984 發表於 2010-10-19 12:51
先驅總是寂寞的..詹導前無古人..只能盼望來者了..
小弟認為目前的廠商太短視近利而導致拿石頭砸自己的腳..3 ...

先討論什麼內容需要用3D來表現,其實很多內容都不需要用3D來表現,但我個人認為影片需要表現出空間內容的才需要3D,但如果所有東西都用3D來表現也無不可,反正新技術都可試試結果,反之我認為能表現出越接近真實的影像才是根本,如顏色的真實度,鏡頭變形的控制,景深的真實性,我覺得先追求真實,再來表現出藝術感,其次才是科技賦予的超現實感,在我看來現今的3D影像並不真實,反而像是超現實的感覺

hua888 · 發表於 2012-10-6 19:42:44

看完所有回覆的文章我終於了解甚麼才是真正的3D影片，受用。

tml7g5 · 發表於 2012-10-11 19:24:08

我想這跟商品標示不實有異曲同工之妙

3D就是3D

2D轉3D應該規範標示為 " 模擬3D " 或 " 2D轉3D "

任何魚目混珠之3D作品應該接受消費者保護法之規範

dr.3dwizard · 發表於 2013-1-10 01:29:32

Let's see what expert says about 3D conversion:

3D Conversion as a tool is okay, but 3D conversion as a means is not.
The key points:

1. Forget about universal solutions for real-time conversion. This is science fiction.
- That means all the ICs embeded inside all 3D TVs only generate funny 3D effect that tricks people's brain and will never ever give what real stereoscopic shooting and manual conversion do.

2. 2D/3D conversion is a fill FX job and requires time and money.
- 2D to 3D conversion invloves a very complex process that will be treated as a special effect and required considerabely large amount of human power, time and budget to produce an acceptable result.

3. Solutions with some "babysitting" may be okay.
- 2D to 3D conversion can be either done semi-auto or pure manual that definately requires human interaction. The rule of thumb for 3D conversion, "never trust a machine".

Cheers!