查看: 15394|回覆: 11
收起左側

D-ILA Projektor JVC DLA-HD1 德國cine4home完整測試報告

[複製連結]

發表於 2007-3-1 00:25:07 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式

馬上註冊,結交更多好友,享用更多功能,讓你輕鬆玩轉社區。

您需要 登錄 才可以下載或查看,沒有賬號?註冊

x
D-ILA Projektor JVC DLA-HD1 德國cine4home完整測試報告


原文網址: http://www.cine4home.de/tests/projektoren/JVC-HD1/HD1Test.htm

 樓主| 發表於 2007-3-1 00:25:51 | 顯示全部樓層
目前積極商借中
希望我們也能早日親眼目睹
回覆 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報


發表於 2007-3-1 06:43:29 | 顯示全部樓層
WEST兄加油,這個HD1看起來很有潛力.

德翻英,

Test: D-ILA projector JVC DLA-HD1

The LCOS Kontrastwunder in the Cine4Home hardened,
what can it do really?
To the main side of www.Cine4Home.de




Now is it finally so far: After our two large Preview finally our large detailed test of the first standard set follows Specials and world first test results, which caused a large resonance in many countries, in this week:

In the last months the LCOS technology in High ending was established range: For many years it led a "Mauerbluemchendasein", but Sony brought with the Qualia004, the VPL-VW100 and the VPL-VW50 the stone in rolling: LCOS projectors showed for the first time, to which for an image quality them able can be, also in the domestic four walls.

Competition animates the business and thus could JVC, nevertheless the inventor of the D-ILA technology and thus joint founder of the LCOS era, not twice be asked to answer with its own home cinema projector to the Sony variants. The result is the JVC DLA-HD1, which announces itself with a large bass drum impact on the market. Its however position characteristic is the sayful high native contrast of 15000:1, that from no other projection technology, all the same whether LCD or DLP is reached. This high native contrast is to make itself directly in the picture paid. JVC applies the HD1 as one of the plastischten video projectors at the market.

With our attendance with JVC in Friedberg we could convince ourselves in December already of the unusual quality of the projector. We reported on it in our two large Preview Specials, the first results already convinced. But in this detailed test we will now examine whether the standard sets also hold, which promised the pilot lot. Somewhat changed? How exactly is the performance of the HD1 to be evaluated in practice? Are the work tolerances how large? On all these questions we will try to give in this Testspecial detailed answers.


We refer those in detail in advance to our test criteria, in our Know How Special: "projectors/PlasmaTVs - quality criteria - which are described test criteria by Cine4Home ".

Bzgl. We refer LCOS technology furthermore to our Know How Special: "D-ILA technology - introduction to the function mode of LCOS projectors".


Due to large range of this test we publish it in three parts in the course of the next days...




1. Equipment and technology (Know How left here)

The HD1 is not the first projector from the house JVC, which is meant for the home cinema market. Before it there was already the HX1/2 and the first FullHD Beamer on the German market, the HD2K. Technically all these devices convinced, but marked one to them that during their construction really with the needs of the home cinema fans one did not deal.

Thus all predecessors showed a very simple Design, similarly that of a conventional presentation projector. They were a little list flexible and not least simply too loud for the domestic use. Thus the concept "D-ILA home cinema projector" already failed because of the substantial bases of practice, although the projectors were qualitatively beyond each suspicion.

Obviously the JVC to it-learned engineers, because with the HD1 all these deficiencies are to be turned off. This shows up already with the outward appearance of the projector: Instead of in the typical "presentation chassis" it appears with noble Design and black finish:

The Design may have failed little, but works it simply elegantly and should with it most tastes meet. Likewise on high level the processing of the DLA-HD1 lies: It works its preisklasse (UVP: ? 6500. -) accordingly high-quality and obtain a stable impression. The upper and lateral finish consists of a high polish lacquer finish, which produces the typical piano lacquer impression.

The front as well as the control panel on the top side are set off silver and form a responding contrast in the housing.


Silver front of the DLA-HD1


The ventilation screens, which exhibit a bee honeycomb structure, are a little habituation needy here it more elegant solutions would have given after our taste.


So nobly that black/silver Design to also work likes, it is not living room compatible in practice necessarily: On the side a black projector under white cover, on the other side is quite remarkable is the black Hochglanzfinisch very dust and scratch sensitive, regular flash and careful handling is more than advisable therefore.

In our Previewspecial we asked our reader whether they would prefer a white version, as them are available in Japan. This version works likewise optically very elegantly, adapts however by the bright exterior better to the normal living room.

Eighty per cent of our readers discussion themselves thereby for the white version, but its desire was not unfortunately erhoert so far: In Europe it remains up to further with the black version, the white variant in this country is not introduced. We consider this decision wrong, because so some home cinema fan will evade not rarely, also for sake the better half sake, which classify black exterior than "KO criterion", and in white models of other marks.


All in all however Design and processing are as expressed successful to designate, the projector mediated also outwardly its high efficiency.




1,1 technology (Know How left here)

With the D-ILA projection it concerns neither an LCD nor DLP technology in the conventional sense. Rather the LCOS technology used here represents a mixture from both: As is the case for the LCD technology also here small liquid crystals ensure for the imaging, but them are not analyzed, but reflect the light, similarly as with the DLP technology. As is the case for a LCD projector it concerns likewise a 3-Chip technology, with which for each basic colour one of the three panels is in use. This technology unites the advantages of both competition techniques: By the reflektive building method no conductive strips are in the optical path, whereby a sayful high filling rate without recognizable pixel structure is possible. The filling rate is clearly higher also opposite DLP, since no mechanical movements take place here. Besides the D-ILA control takes place similar, whereby DLP typical artifacts, like noise or False Contour, are avoided. Thus the D-ILA projection of all technologies works most naturally and just as similarly, as the film original.

Who would like itself more exactly to train into the function mode of the D-ILA technology, our HD1-Preview-Special can use , there we the technical structure as well as the innovations of the HD1 in detail presented as starting point.



Like always we dared a view the inside the projector, impressed the fact that it concerned at the time of the test the only coming into Germany, us little thereby; -)

The cover of the DLA-HD1 can be removed after loosening of some screws simply, to the appearance comes the internal technical structure:

In the picture the projektionsoptik was already removed above from us. The chamber lying behind gives a view on the optical block with the surrounding D-ILA panels (recognizable from the radiator box)


Back of the D-ILA panel


By screen sheet metals protected signal electronics on the left side of the projector, which precipitates this time substantially more compactly than with other D-ILA models, is.


Vekapselte electronics of the HD1

Also to this place we risked a view in the inside, kept endless flat cables we the "brain" of the projector in the hands later.


Upper and lower surface that
HD1-Steuerelektronik


Heart of electronics is the Gennum VXP processor, which is to lend particularly good scaling and De-Interlacingeigenschaften to the Beamer. It is remarkable and advertising-effectively in the middle on the plate positioned.

How well the VXP chip performs its work in the DLA-HD1, we will examine in the course of the picture test, but its call is already more than good first.


Apart from new optical structure and new signal electronics the HD1 is to shine also by a particularly quiet ventilation. Thereby the technical realization is interesting: Like a horseshoe the air duct pulls itself as cycle by the projector.


The ventilation cycle of the HD1


The cooling air right sucked in of the optics (1), the diagonal lamellas provide here for a sichtschutz. Fresh air cools first signal electronics (2) as well as the power pack, which are under it. At the back air u-shaped is continued to steer on the lamp, which is positioned at the rear left (3), before air heated up leaves the projector again (4). For further illustration we opened the black Lueftunkskanal:

An exhaust, which can move much air by its generous dimension (owing to the large housing of the HD1, becomes visible) with moderate umlaufzahl. In direct neighbourhood are lamp pit and first integrator lens of the optical path.


Picture center: Lamp pit with integrator lens
Right/down: Exhaust

Underneath the lamp (here developed) is a temperature sensor, which protects the lamp against overheating (arrow). Directly after passing the lamp warmed up air is blown again from the projector.


Attentive readers will have noticed that this ventilation cycle does not cool the optical block of the projector. Considering the large dust danger a combined ventilation would be also very risky. One learned also here in addition: The cooling air necessary for the "Optical engine" is sucked in by its own exhaust from the projector lower surface. The exhaust is platziert thereby perpendicularly apart from the optics:


Exhaust for the optical block

If one throws a view of the projector lower surface, one discovers the suitable intake. It is protected by a fine filter against disturbing dust.


Ventilation slots with pertinent filter


Air cleaners on the lower surface make often a aufwaendige disassembly of the deckenhalterung necessarily, not however with the HD1. Engineers thought also here to end, because the filter can be pulled simply laterally from the projector, without this must be moved. Thus nothing stands to a regular cleaning of the filter in the way.


With the source of light it acts around a 200W-Variante out of Japanese landing, for it to JVC a new co-operation partner was, since past manufacturers would not fulfill the quality requirements consistently enough.

The lamp module is uncommonly compact and for a Heimkinobeamer almost typical. The fact that also it can be changed if necessary comfortably, without the projector from its assembly is pleasing to l eyes. The pit is on the side and can be opened after loosening of a screw.

Simple lamp change with the HD1


How often does one have to count on such a lamp change? According to manufacturer the variant used in the HD1 has one life span of approximately 2000 hours. After this time it supplies with still approx. to 50% of its original luminosity, is thus not not directly defective. This life span is present average with Heimkinobeamern, can however not by the lamp savings mode be extended. We spoke with engineers about it: Lamp manufacturers do not guarantee under any circumstances a longer lifetime, if the lamp is operated "under target". One decided to indicate also at the lamp life span honest values. We consider this honest proceeding exemplary, not rarely in folders exorbitantly long lifetimes will be promised, guaranteed however however only to a few hundred hours.


And how loud or quietly above ventilation system, JVC works was so far not for quiet projectors well-known? We can give 'all-clear' signal, in normally the mode are audible the ventilation, but in the film enterprise not disturbing, even if one sits close at the equipment. The HD1 belongs without a doubt to the quieter its kind. It becomes louder however in the "High mode", here is clearly audible and for some ears also the projector disturbing. However the additional light reserves are used only for large canvas widths over 2,8m.


Altogether the technical structure of the JVC-HD1 is just as high-quality, as its exterior appearance. The processing is also on the inside exemplary, everything works stably, is cleanly arranged and conscientiously shielded. The ventilation system is durchdacht and made possible also positionings close at rear walls, since on the back no ventilation slots are. The binary ventilation system, which supplies the Light engine with own, dust-protected cooling air, is very praise worth. Together with the absolutely high-quality encapsulation of the optical block no dust problems are to be expected here. The practical accessibility of the lamp pit and the air cleaner the good impression the increased volume in the high lamp mode off, only evaluate we round negatively.




1,2 connections/picture signals (Know How left here)

With the entrances one concentrated primarily on digital signal transmission. The projector offers entrances equivalent two to HDMI (1.2), so that also several devices can be attached at the same time digitally.

Beside the digital entrances are present the usual analog variants, component (YUV), s-video and Composite. To criticize it is here that each entrance is only once present. Also the projector has entrance no separate VGA (RGB) -, so that for the connection of a PC to the digital entrance must be fallen back. Here the manufacturer could have been "more generous" a little, because also today yet each PC or laptop does not have a digital picture exit. Besides the projector does not support any dissolutions of PC, neither XGA, nor SXGA, still SVGA. One must thus its PC on video dissolutions (1280x720 or 1920x1080) trims, in order to be able to project with the HD1 a Desktop.

The flexible video signal support is pleasing: 480i/p, 576i/p, 720p60/50, 1080i60/50, 1080p60/50/24 can the projector verabeiten. Straight over the 1080p/24 processing (over HDMI)"Pulldown Hasser" will be pleased at times of the HP-DVD and Blu ray more than.


With our disassembly we more exactly examined also the entrance board. A camouflaged service haven was noticeable to us, which is accompanied by many DIP Switches.


The entrance board with mysterious service haven



Technology Freaks should make themselves however no wrong hopes: After consultation with JVC we experienced the fact that no Consumer software for this haven is planned since to the inside of the equipment is fallen back too much here. Instead one considers a software, with which one can adjust further picture parameters over the RS-232 haven.




1,3 list (Know How left here)

A modern projector must be flexible, since the different space integrations make often special places of assembly necessary. Some area requires a short distance, other one a large, again different a list at the edge, away from the Z-axis. Here we were more than positively surprised of the new characteristics of the HD1. Contrary to its predecessors the HD1 offers an uncommonly large zoom shot range, even a so large that above all the DLP competition does not come along here any longer:

Spacer table JVC DLA-HD1

As one can infer from the above spacer table, the projector offers a sayful large zoom shot range. So can in the home cinema usual the display width of e.g. 2,7m already from a distance from 3,6m(!!) are realized. In addition, in larger areas 7,3m distance are possible with same dimension of picture area. More flexibly the zoom shot range of a projector does not have to be.


The optics of the DLA-HD1,
it makes the large zoom shot range possible



And also to a Lens SHIFT one thought this time. This precipitates likewise sayful largely and strikes the competitor VPL-VW50 clearly.

Up to 80% in the height and 34% in the width can be shifted the projector by the axle. The straight horizontal SHIFT range is to be found with no other FullHD projector so largely. Combined with the large zoom shot range JVC sets here completely clearly new yardsticks. The DLA-HD1 is problem-free applicable in almost any area!


There are however military courage drops: Zoom shot, focus and Lensshift are to be served only manually, luxury in vain as with the Sony VPL-VW50 or Mitsubishi HC5000 look for one. Besides the Lens SHIFTS mechanics of the HD1 were only solved satisfying. It is a little precise and "partly jumps" with the rotation of the wheels, instead of acting sensitivly. Besides de Raeder have very much play.


Lens SHIFT mechanics of the HD1

A view of the mechanics clarifies these weaknesses: The transmissions from numerous plastikraedern do not make a particularly high-quality impression, a locking are missing. Therefore one must bring along little patience, in order to align the HD1 to the canvas. Once adjusted the optics does not adjust itself however.




In our first test chapter the HD1 on nearly whole line convinces: Responding and high-quality working exterior, outstanding designed internal structure and one impress list flexibility correspond to the present requirement, which one can place against to High ending a Beamer of this preisklasse. Only the manual optics attitudes, the absence of PC entrances and dissolutions as well as the volume in the high lamp mode cloud the otherwise protruding impression.





2. Operation (Know How left here)

The operation is a substantial quality factor of each projector, here must the optimal combination of adjusting variety and clarity be always ordered. Nothing is more frustrating, as if one cannot affect certain aspects of the picture or the operation precipitates unnecessarily complicated.



2,1 remote maintenance

Past D-ILA projectors tested by us did not shine straight with their remote maintenance. They fit rather projectors of the entrance class High ending devices. This one saw with JVC obviously, one the HD-1 now a particularly beautiful infrared giver spendiert.

The remote maintenance is structured clear and offers meaningful key allocations. Like that different Presets as well as all entrances are directly callable by depressing the key. At the same time the tax cross is arranged generous. If necessary all keys can be lit up electrically, so that readability is ensured also in dark areas. The range of the infrared giver is absolutely exemplary and permits a reliable operation also in large areas with seating positions before or behind the projector.


All substantial control keys are accommodated also elegantly directly on the equipment top side. So the projector can be used also in the case of empty batteries of the remote maintenance. But caution: On the black surface one sees each finger mark!


Control panel on the top side of the HD1




2,2 menus

The menu structure of the DLA-HD1 is clear in six main categories, "image", "Setup", "video", "Install", "Func." and "info." partitions. This facilitates navigation uncommonly. Here the columns in the detail:



2.2.1 "Image" column

Like the name contains this column already says substantial picture parameters. Typical adjusting parameters, which might be common the specialist, are clearly one above the other arranged:


The "Image" menu of the HD1


In the Unterrubrik "image Adjust" are all fundamental parameters such as contrast, brightness, to find color etc.. Hereby a fast alignment is possible on the signal source. The functions "Sharpness" and "DNR" are particularly worth mentioning, with which the excellent intoxication corrections of verwendetene gene around signal processing can be configured.

It continues to go with "Color temp": Here a healthy mixture from Werkspresets and own adjustment possibilities is ordered. Three color temperatures stand to the selection, "Low", "Middle" and "High", whereby the Middle attitude is to correspond to a D65-Kalibrierung, more to it in the picture test. Who would like to put on even hand, which the color temperature can affect by means of RGB automatic controllers. When starting point for own color calibrations is however always "High", speaks all basic colours maximized (scarcely under the Clipping border), why the RGB automatic controllers can be placed also only in negatives. A Nachjustage of the "Middle" mode is not possible thus, which for laymen without measuring instruments would sometimes have been substantially simpler. Remarkable it is also that the projector does not exhibit separate Gain (for bright of ranges) and bias (for dark ranges) automatic controllers. Instead the automatic controllers affect all brightness. Same applies for automatic controller to the "RGB offset", affects one all brightness stages also here, however in rougher steps.


To what extent these adjustment possibilities for an exact adjustment of the color temperature are sufficient, depends on the linearity of factory setting. We will examine this still in detail in the picture part.

In the "Gamma" menu likewise different Presets is available, which we will likewise seize in the picture part instrumentation. "normal" is preset, which should correspond to the video standard. Own gamma attitudes are not possible in this menu.

Among home cinema fans there were in the last weeks much discussions, whether possibly separate gamma will be offered -- a software by JVC, with which one with the help of a PC the gamma distribution to program can. For the brothers HD2K and HD10K gives it to such a software. We held in this connection with engineers consultation: How already describes under technology, no Consumer software the special service haven, over which also the "Look UP Tables" is programmed, is published. At present the developers examine whether they can make a gamma programming for haven possible over the RS232. The chances for this stand well, but a definite statement or an announcement cannot be made for this.


More the last category, "pixel Adjust" than positively surprised us. Straight one at times of the Full hp dissolution comes the topic convergence not rarely into the main focus of many home cinema fans. Perfect a convergence is actual over the entire picture with a 3-Chip projector of this dissolution a certain utopia. The convergence should be however good enough, in order to provoke in the current film picture not disturbing color fringings. JVC offers a very small tolerance ex factory, as one described us. Additionally however the possibility is given to the user to affect even the convergence:


The convergence menu of the DLA-HD1

Everything drei(!) Basic colours can be shifted both horizontal and vertically, and directly several pixels. However the possible shift is always for the entire picture equally. If the convergence on the left side is different, than e.g. on the right, one will be able to reach no perfect convergence by means of the entire picture. With the help of this menu it is however nevertheless possible, in the particularly important part of the picture, for the picture center, a convergence shift of no more than realizing a half pixel. Many home cinema fans will particularly be pleased about the option, let them a Sony Ruby or Pearl so painfully miss nevertheless.



2.2.2 "Setup" column

The second main column offers various possibilities of storing the desired picture configurations in own profiles. Additionally three Werkspresets are available, which are self-describing before-configured for different targeted applications.


Furthermore with "HDMI inputs level" can be selected the HDMI level between PC and video. Also this function facilitates the adjustment to the signal source uncommonly.

It remains the function "MASK": In principle the DLA-HD1 works at HDTV signals completely without Overscan, indicates thus pixel-perfectly the entire picture content. However if disturbing artifacts at the contour are to be faded out, then they can be masked with this function. This does not apply however only to hp signals, with conventional SD signals (e.g. PAL) has one any influence on Overscan or Blanking. This is a deficiency that during High ending Beamer should not be, more in addition in the picture test.



2.2.3 "Video" column

The third column "video" offers different aspects of the signal adjustment. The possibility is rarely however not unpractical of specifying the detailed digital picture signal. As one sees in the following screen SHOT, the projector supports both RGB- and YUV 4:2:2 and 4:4:4 coding.


With the "Comp" function the user can specify, whether against the similar YUV entrance really also a YUV signal rests, or a RGB signal. Thus it possible also RGB Scart (e.g. of a Satellitenreceiver) is to be fed into the projector. "film mode" offers the choice between car and off (with lying close half-image signals). Usually one leaves this function on car, with off can the De-Interlacer however if necessary into the video mode be forced.
"Color system" is exclusive for (s) video signals thought, here can be switched if necessary manually between NTSC, PAL and Secam. Same applies to "Black level", with which the similar black level between 0 and 7,5% can be affected.



2.2.4 "Install" column

The Install menu offers self-describing all relevant options for the list of the projector.

Apart from front & rueckprojektion the OSD menus can be trimmed here on the own taste.



2.2.5 "Func." column

In the fifth category "Function" appear all options, which did not fit thematically into the other columns.

Here three functions are particularly worth mentioning: With "Sleep timer" users can protect the projector against the fact that he keeps running for hours in the case of a sudden sleep accumulation and so valuable lamp time wasted (see above). We consider this function expressed practical and hope that them will be more frequent to find in other models also in the future. With "Lamp power" the lamp brightness between "normal" and "High" can be switched, more in addition in the picture test. The third practical function is "Testpattern", with which numerous test patterns can be called up, from colors to image definition. An internal test pattern generator shows the professional origins of this D-ILA of projector.



2.2.6 "Info" column

The sixth column offers no adjusting parameters, informs the user however about signal put on and used lamp time.



Altogether the control surface of the DLA-HD1 offers numerous functions, which are necessary for a further picture optimization in a clear and intuitive operated way. The mixture from required Presets and own adjusting options succeeded thereby and balanced. However experienced home cinema fans will evaluate the limited options critically for picture adjustment. Compared with many other projectors the parameters of the HD1 are reduced to the necessary minimum. It hangs thus strongly of the starting point, denies to the factory setting of the projector, which can be realized for a picture accuracy with the DLA-HD1. We will examine this in the coming picture test, which we will publish in the next days.




3. Picture test

Now we come finite to the picture part of this test. In our Preview Specials we published already many results to the pilot lot model, it remain the question, as well "manufacture ourselves" standard sets, let us speak the models, which one can buy in the business, in the comparison to strike. Meanwhile we had the possibility of examining three "genuine" standard sets whereby our results are to be regarded as adequate and finally.



3,1 Screendoor/raster (Know How left here)

One of the largest advantages of the LCOS and/or D-ILA technology is the reflecting function of the panels without disturbing conductive strips in the optical path. Thus the pixels move uncommonly close together, so that hardly still distances can be noticed.


Pixel raster of the HD1 from few centimeters
Distance photographs

In addition projector comes like the JVC the high native resolution of over two million pixels with a FullHD. The combination of tiny pixels and high filling rate (over 90%) makes the HD1 a nearly pixel-free projector. Even from short viewing distances the fly lattice is not to be recognized.




3,2 color extent (Know How left here)

In things color extent did not do opposite our Previewtest much: As measuring pole for the color extent clearly the Sony VPL-VW100 was considered in the past twelve months. The projector with its xenon lamp and his sun-similar spectrum to its color extent jumped over itself over the video standards, but straight this constituted a large part of the fascination in the color representation for many.

In the DLA-HD1 finds no xenon lamp use, which the purse thanks by clearly smaller running costs. Instead a 200W UHP lamp was blocked, how it is usual for home cinema projectors. This lamp offers however no as balanced spectrum, as the expensive and aufwaendige xenon variant. In order to be received however no deficits in the colors, JVC an unusual beginning selected:

Inside the projector are special filters, which let happen only selected spectral portions filter undesired spectral portions of the UHP light and. Particularly disturbing yellow portions from green are eliminated in such a way, which comes the color representation to property. In this way the projector loses light (without farbanpassung the HD1 would be too far over 1000Lumen able), but is as a similar color extent as with xenon to be realized. And the thought out method was confirmed also in our measurements: The projector actually has an uncommonly large color area, which can take up it even with the Sony Ruby.


Left: Color extent DLA-HD1, right: Sony VPL-VW100 (Ruby)
The secondary colors are very well co-ordinated in the series

In the comparison that the color extent precipitates similarly largely, only in the red offers above the xenon lamp still more clearance is to be recognized for strong colors. Are impressing this result, are nevertheless two completely different lamp techniques in the use. In the spectrographic analysis differences show up then however nevertheless: As already described must with the UHP lamp disturbing spectral portions are filtered, while with xenon the spectrum can be projected almost not filtered on the canvas.


Left: Spectrographic analysis DLA-HD1, right: Sony VPL-VW100 (Ruby)

As one sees, the xenon lamp in its spectrum with the large bath tub curves remains ungeschlagen. To what extent this positively affects the eye, cannot be occupied with measuring instruments. Not few video purists state to constitute a visible difference with the xenon lamp in the current film picture. Others state again that a difference cannot be visibly, since the "peaks" of the basic colours decide sensitively to those our eye particularly reacted.

We for our part are likewise the opinion that the xenon lamp makes itself still paid. The JVC HD1 offers an absolutely protruding image representation, which simulates the large cinema chromatic spectrum appropriately. Over the Limitationen of the video standard with its almost "pale" basic colours one jumped over oneself consciously. Or other scene in the comparison nevertheless works a little too multicolored, a xenon projector like the VPL-100 succeeds mixes from natural natural colors and strengthens, "poppigen" colors, where desired, better, than the HD1.

With the topic increasingly the spirit separates color area: Video purists will criticize the fact that the required color area offers more, than the video standard plans and so possibly surfeited can work colors. Film fans however see straight in the reduced color area a disturbing compromise to the cinema original, which likewise exhibits a substantially larger color area. In any case ones to criticize one cannot do the fact that the HD1 does not offer real color space adjustment, speaks a Color management like many other projectors of this preisklasse. Like that one is fixed on the large color area and can affect him only with the help of the general saturation automatic controller. A selection of different color areas would have been desirably minimal, as they offer ever more projectors at the market. For film looking the work selection of the HD1 is however more than recommendable and meets the taste of most home cinema fans, that want to really bring the experience to cinema, with all its color splendour, home.





3,3 color temperature (Know How left here)

One of our favourite topics is the color temperature of a projector. On it the naturalness of the picture essentially depends, but its accuracy is much too often neglected during factory setting culpably. With good example here JVC went, to each D-ILA projector tested by us in front was almost perfectly with the D65 (6500K) video standard co-ordinated always.

In order to receive really representative results, we through-measured this time equivalent three standard sets, in order to be able to recognize also possible work dispersions. The "Middle" Preset corresponds according to manufacturer of the D65-Videonorm, we begins with the first test equipment:


"Middle" factory settings of the first standard set

Our first series candidate shows one more than impressing work tuning: The color temperature is not only uncommonly near their desired value, but also even over almost all brightness away absolutely. This causes a akkurate and at the same time homogeneous color representation, better hardly goes it ex factory. Or nevertheless? - the second standard set really surprised us:


Factory setting of the second standard set

With the second standard set the "Fernkalibrierer" carried whole work out from Japan: The projector is more exact on the point, can a Kalibirerung hardly fail. Only in dark Breichen a minimum Magentaueberschuss shows up. Nevertheless: So far hardly another projector offered such good results ever ex factory.


Factory setting of the third standard set

With our third test copy the Farbtemepratur failed always still well, but as no longer perfectly as with the other two. Here a small blue surplus makes itself noticeably, at least for videophile extremists.


As far as factory settings, with which the HD1 in this category Bestnoten ergattert itself. But how well one can adjust if necessary the color temperature? In the last weeks the limited RGB possibilities for many were a large discussion topic. We can give 'all-clear' signal: In the opposite, ever it was not so simple to bring the color temperature of a projector as fast on the desired point as with the HD1. It handed to co-ordinate the color temperature of a middle brightness stage (50%) and all other brightness stages behaved identically.


Improved color temperature with the help of the RGB automatic controllers

Unfortunate it is with the fact only that the outstanding "Middle" Preset cannot be after-corrected, but "the user 1/2" modes as starting point always the much to cool "High" Preset at the basis put. Also the RGB values of the Middle Presetes in the normal menu are not indicated, so that one cannot umkopieren them also. Nevertheless: The concerns around the color temperature adjustment possibilities of the HD1 were unfounded.


In the result the projector shows a natural color representation, which comes the cinema original very close. The balance of the basic colours succeeded thereby outstanding, to chromatic distortions in the Greens or blue ones does not emerge not, also not with the secondary colors. Here and there the HD1 works however a little too multicolored, which must be attributed to the large color area. The compromise is according to our opinion acceptable however to favour of the many more beautiful "cinema colors" more than. Who wants it still better, which must change over to xenon.





3,4 schwarzwert, contrast, brightness (Know How left here)

Now we come to the however position characteristic of the DLA-HD1: No less than 15000:1 native contrast is to avoid the Beamer on the canvas, that is approximately a trebling of the possible one, all the same which projection technology.

A value, which sounds too beautiful, in order to be true. For this reason we particularly exactly measured and us again all three standard sets before-buttoned. The results thereby were convincing: The HD1 actually reaches this factory specification, and even on adherence to the D65-Videonorm, speak with correct colors. It gives to consider however a few details: So the zoom shot has a direct influence on contrast and brightness. The more near one the projector to the canvas places (the more largely the zoom shot), the more lights has one on the canvas, the smaller is however the contrast. One places the projector with same dimension of picture area away (small zoom shot), the better continues to become Schwwarzwert and contrast, but one has also less maximum brightness on the canvas.


Contrast/brightness - measuring table
JVC DLA-HD1
Zoom shot         Color mode         Lamp mode         Light/lumen         Contrast
                                         
Max one         Means (D65)         High         720         12000:1
Max one         High         High         808         14000:1
Max one         Means (D65)         Normally         600         12000:1
Max one         High         Normally         670         14000:1
                                         
Mid         Means (D65)         High         615         13500:1
Mid         High         High         695         15900:1
Mid         Means (D65)         Normally         520         13500:1
Mid         High         Normally         590         15900:1
                                         
Min         Means (D65)         High         500         15700:1
Min         High         High         541         19300:1
Min         Means (D65)         Normally         408         15700:1
Min         High         Normally         465         19300:1


As one can infer from the table, the maximum zoom shot offers more brightness to approximately 25%, than the minimum zoom shot. At the same time however the contrast is better around likewise approximately 25% with the minimum zoom shot. Here the user, if it permits the area, can even bestimmern, who weighting it wants to have. A good compromise is always a list in the middle zoom shot range.

We conversed with JVC about this phenomenon. Reason for these large differences is a combination of extremely large zoom shot range of the optics and the firm iris in the focus. It is not correct under any circumstances the fact that the HD1 has no screen in the optical path how in some tests falsely states. In the focus of the optics, is a firm scattered light screen, which increases the in image contrast clearly.


Scattered light screen in the optics


In the large "professional brothers" of the HD1 the screen adapts mechanically to the adjusted zoom shot and permits so always same contrast and brightness. In the HD1 however a static screen was blocked, so that above tolerances are to be regarded regarding the zoom shot as normal.


Concerning the results of measurement we would like to mention that they failed with all standard sets tested by us very constantly and homogeneously (+/- a few per cent). Thus also in the series a good Konstanz is ordered here, which corresponds to the factory specifications. Again one must express JVC for its honesty large praise.



The high native contrast of the JVC projector is to bring in relation to adaptive iris solutions, like for example with the Sony VPL-VW50, advantages. "why that?" so some reader will ask itself, "on/off contrast is equal to on/off contrast". This is correct in practice however not completely. The following diagram is intended to clarify the difference:

Left the contrast relationship of the JVC is represented schematically, it amounts to always 15000:1. That is, the black level is always equal darkly, the weisspegel always equivalent brightly. Right the adaptive function of a screen is described. It closes with dark scenes and improves the schwarzwert. In bright scenes it opens and improves the maximum brightness. Which however is the native contrast of the projector, which lies in the case of the VW50 for example between 2000:1 and 4000:1, remains always unchanged (depending upon opening degrees). In other words: In and the same picture can white be at the most 3000 times brighter as black. With the DLA-HD1 white can be 15000 times brighter however, as black. Either bright details are thus brighter in an predominantly dark scene, or the schwarzwert is better.

This theory is more than plausible, can be sceptically regarded however in this form. Because it ignores various scattered light factors, which reduce the in picture contrast inevitably. Also with a native contrast of 15000:1 in most scenes a projector will be able to never hold a contrast of 15000:1 within a picture. The ANSI Kontrastmessung is thereby a good example: With a projected chessboard the contrast between white and black fields corresponds never to the on/off contrast, but always only a fraction, mostly between 250:1 and 600:1.

Nevertheless: Actually the advantages of the native contrast in the direct comparison were to be seen clear. Straight one in dark scenes visibly profited the picture depth. While the schwarzwert was on easily better level than with the VPL-VW50, bright details were at the same time substantially more radiating worked out. This e.g. with a starlit sky from star Wars, the stars was clear was worked out substantially more clearly clearly more radiating than with the SXRD projector, the contrast between black space and bright leuchtpunkten. The following spaceship worked likewise clearly more radiating, the picture won increasingly in picture depth. This observation could be transferred to many scenes. Even in brighter TV scenes in parts platischere working out of details was noticeable owing to higher in image contrast clearly.


Above comparison approximates the impression locally much:
The HD1 (right) worked better out contrasts straight in dark scenes


In addition it must be said that it concerns with the projection picture of the VPL-VW50 an uncommonly plastic picture. The Sony projector belonged at present also to the reference standard in the home cinema and offers everything else as a dull picture. Many are already inspired of the picture depth of the Sony Beamers. The JVC DLA-HD1 succeeds in nevertheless setting still "one drauf". The projector is still more platischer, contrasts is still better worked out. This shows, on which high level we move here. No question, in things contrast sets the new JVC projector new yardsticks, and this not only regarding its direct competitor, but regarding all at present usual techniques within the home cinema range. In addition, one must say to it that the differences are not like day and night, it is however a visible step of "Gut+" on "much property".

In things native contrast promised JVC not too much. The HD1 belongs with distance to the plastischten Heimkinobeamern, which give it - and includes all technologies.





3,5 gamma distribution/homogeneity (Know How left here)

How well does the DLA-HD1 exhaust its high contrast, does speak, the brightness distribution (gamma) is how good "programmed"? Similarly as with the color temperature standards must be kept here, in order to obtain as plastic and natural an picture impression as possible.

As already describes under operation, the HD1 offers to only four Werkspresets for the gamma influence, a gamma manager is not yet officially announced at present. We examined the four Presets:


Factory setting is gamma off, speaks "native" projectors gamma, here we for the investigation of the series dispersion of three devices tested.


Gamma Werkspreset (normal)


Two of our test models exhibited thereby an exemplary 2.26-Gamma to be recognized as in the measuring diagram above. One of the devices offered an easily higher gamma of 2,3. It is to be accepted thus that the tolerance permits a gamma between 2,2 and 2,3 here. This is for a Werkspreset protruding, corresponds it nevertheless to the practical video standard and permitted so the most natural image representation.

It continues to go with the next Preset, which was called unfortunately insignificant "A". How does the projector behave here?


Gammapreset "A"

First an exemplary even 2,24-Gammakurve, it shows up also here seems hardly a change to give. The image representation remains actual to a large extent invariably, but with a difference: Dark picture elements near at black are emphasized and worked out more strongly. It is possible to reach in not optimized areas of more Durchzeichnung in dark pictures. Who the measuring diagrams regards this exactly to read off also there will be able: The at the beginning of the curve (left) is attached with the "A"-Setting more highly than "normal".


Little meaningful the Settings brings to "B" and "C", with first the gamma is easily raised, whereby the Durchzeichnung suffers, but the Bildplatizitaet does not rise. "C" however is a flatter gamma, which is meant probably for projections on low light conditions.


With the two Werkspresets "the DLA-HD1 in each home cinema offers normal" and "A" an uncommonly plastic picture that to the video standard adheres exemplary. No details are swallowed in the dark one, nothing work artificially over-radiated, here give it to nothing to expose. It becomes difficult, if the user liked to realize a steeper gamma, in order to increase the subjective plasticity of the picture. This is not at present possible with the HD1!




3.6 sharpness/illuminating/convergence (Know How left here)

With FullHD the optical sharpness of the projection became particularly important. The picture can convert only then the high resolution of the picture signal, if the sharpness of the optics permits this. Also the tuning of the three basic colours one on the other, speak convergence, must be as exact as possible.


The projektionsoptik of the HD1

The optics of the HD1 carries here good work out, it ensured over the entire picture an even sharpness, which dissolves also finest details appropriately. Only when extreme use the Lensshifts Unschaerfen can in-smuggle themselves in boundary regions, which are however technically conditioned and occur rarely in practice.


For the convergence we examined again all three devices parallel. JVC betrayed us that the work tolerances permit approximately a half pixel disalignment in the picture center and to pixels in the boundary regions. Practice shows that these strict tolerances are well kept.

Our first test equipment showed only a minimum blue disalignment of approx. a half pixel (see above). This is to be constituted only from next proximity and disturbs the dissolution of the projector in no way.

The other two devices exhibited an easy disalignment of red, which constitutes half pixel approximately with the help of the digital convergence shift over the entire picture. Also these are clearly better for a 3-Chip FulHD projector outstanding results, than with so some competition model.


And also in things illuminating does not afford the HD1 weaknesses: Even to the boundary regions no uneven illuminating is to be recognized. Also Desktop projections (computer use) work absolutely evenly. In the black however easily lightened corners are to be noticed, regular readers already know this phenomenon by the Sony SXRD projectors also with the standard sets.


Easily lightened corners in black

The Auhellung of the corners is however so subtle that she is not noticeable in the film enterprise.





3,7 Overscan (Know How left here)

In the chapter "operation" we already dealt with it: The HD1 has a masking function, not however over adjustment possibilities of the Overscans. Here one depends thus on factory settings of the manufacturer:


- 1080i/p/720p

At the hp passing on the DLA-HD1 works perfectly freely from Overscan, the entire picture content is represented, in the case of 1080p signals even pixel-perfectly.

With this result each home cinema fan is lucky, no contours artificially is nevertheless cut off. If necessary function a black Blanking framework can be faded in with the "MASK", which will however probably do nobody in practice. The advantage of a Blankings instead of Overscan is with 1080p passing on the retention of the pixel-exact control.



- 576p

Bicht so well looks it when the progressive PAL (576p) passing on. Here approximately 25 (PAL)Pixel on each side becomes cut off.


Not changeable Overscan with 576p

Such a lighter Overscan for the representation of television transmissions sense makes, but would be it better, if the user could determine the Overscan, how it is with almost any home cinema projector today the case.



-576i

Directly too largely finally the Overscan is with conventional PAL, speaks 576i (Interlaced). Over 40 pixels on each side are cut off, that are alone horizontal over 10% of the picture content.


To large Overscan with 576i

Particularly disturbing is besides that with Cinemascope films the 21:9 format is not maintained. Also this Overscan cannot be affected with the HD1.


Who wants to always admire the entire picture content on the canvas with the new JVC Beamer, does not come around around as native a HDTV passing on as possible. Are recommended therefore as Zuspieler DVD Player and Satellitenreceiver, which can spend directly by inserted Scaler 1080i/p. Considering the efficient gene around chip in the HD1, which would show a better scaling in the case of doubt, this unnecessary deficiency of the Overscans is incomprehensible, in these High ending class only to almost any entrance projector offers meanwhile a variable Overscan for all dissolutions, this should also here be possible.




3,8 De-Interlacing (Know How left here)

Considering the large Overscans with 576i-Signalen the De-Interlacing becomes already nearly a purely academic question, at least with PAL. We examined it nevertheless in used detailedness:



Standard definition (SD) material

The Gennum VXP comes outstanding with video material rightfully. After Motion adaptive one procedure it interlaces reliably standing picture elements, while it moved high-interpolated. The processor is thereby in any case sport & televisionsuited.

Likewise outstanding works the film Deinterlacing for features, which are noted with 24(25) pictures per second. Also with PAL material the projector gets along problem-free and finds the correct Rhytmus for the half-image interlacing reliable.



High definition (hp) material

For the De-Interlacing of hp (1080i) material is used likewise the Gennum with VXP. We examined and were very impressed again the De-Interlacing with numerous Hp DVDs and Blu rays with difficult film scenes: The De-Interlacer succeeds in to prepare also filmmaterial outstanding and avoiding disturbing edge flares. Even most difficult scenes remained stable for picture errors on the canvas, are the absolute exception. So far is us no better Hp De Interlacing meets, than with the Gennum VXP.

Is missing does to the HD1 only a Reverse Pulldown for the reconstruction of the original cinema frequency of 24Hz at fed 1080/60Hz signals. That is unfortunate, because in addition the Gennum processor is not able, but can one for the HD1 reproaches here make. No other model at the market (with exception of the Projecion Design 1080) offers this feature.




3,9 detail loyalty/scaling/sharpness (Know How left here)

We expect likewise good results from the scaling abilities of the HD1 with its Gennum VXP processor. Still the scaling is important, because conventional PAL will accompany us still many years.

Horizontal the Gennum carries outstanding services out, it converts the Pa run solution adequately and hardly provokes also in difficult frequency ranges interference.


Very good scaling characteristics
without linearity fluctuations


Also the drop in level of highest dissolution resolutions precipitates small enough, in order to provoke no sharpness losses in the picture. Vertically likewise outstanding scaling results show up.


Also vertically hardly scaling artifacts

Even single-line details (screen SHOT above) are represented absolutely freely by scaling us artifacts. Better a scaling can hardly fail, the high native FullHD dissolution of the projector comes to meet much.


As far as so good, to here it has the appearance that the scaling characteristics of the DLA-HD1 do not leave desires open. This applies also to similar sources (e.g. YUV), and digital passing on over HDMI RGB or HDMI YPbPr 4:4:4. With HDMI YPbPr 4:2:2 was noticeable to us however unfortunately a Chroma Upsampling problem:



HDMI 4:2:2 Chroma Upsampling with 576p/i material

If one feeds the HD1 with digital 576p material in 4:2:2 procedure coded, then the projector must project the Chromaaufloesung themselves. Here an error in-crept, vertically columns was exchanged. Well one can examine with Hife of a color Multibursts.

In the above screen SHOT one recognizes the vertical banding, which provokes disturbing artifacts in the picture. This becomes still clearer with colored diagonal edges:


Incorrect Chroma Upsampling


This phenomenon is us in the courseness frequently meets, we in appropriate places on it had reported:

Also in the current film picture, particularly with multicolored scenes, the picture impression can be clouded.

Above screen SHOT shows clearly, as the Chromabug can make itself bermerkbar: Both the blue and red outlines show fraying and even doubling tires, which are to due in each case to the column permutation.

Also Buzz Lightyear shows clear fraying in eye and chin portions. As is the case for many things such Verfremdungen can disturb much, if one became attentive to her.


Above Detailausschnit, this time from the material film "star Wars",
shows likewise the stairway steps



But there are "Workarounds": Solution of the problem is switching to HDMI RGB and/or YPbPr 4:4:4. With such passing on the farbkanaele will individually completely transfer and the disturbing picture fraying will disappear.


DVI/HDMI RGB, no fraying

With DVD Playern this is thus unproblematically, simply the Player on DVI or HDMI (RGB) switches, already disappears the problem. But which is with future sources of picture such as satellite, BluRay or HP-DVD? Here it is not yet clear whether they will at all still support all the RGB standard, and also they will increasingly be used for PAL material.


No solution gives it for the representation of digital 576i-Signalen, how they can be spent by some DVD Playern and receivern. Here the projector seems to process only one quarter of the dissolution, which expresses itself by rough Kloetzchenbildung:


576i over HDMI, reduced dissolution



Digital 576i-Signale is rather the rarity, so that the fehlerhate representation should not constitute anything in practice. It is however unfortunate that one thus cannot fall back to the outstanding De-Interlacing-characteristics of the Gennum. Nevertheless a better De-Interlacing could succeed to the HD1, than so some DVD Player or receiver.



Considering the high preisklasse and the high-quality signal processor Upsampling errors described above should not emerge with the HD1. We referred engineers to this 576p-Probleme and one insured us that on an update one works. As soon as this appears, we will report on it.

But apart from this "nose" the HD1 in things scaling and detail representation offers outstanding results. The scaling is almost freely of linearity fluctuations, fine details cleanly is dissolved and angmessen sharply, i.e. over-sharpens not artificially, brought on the canvas.




3,10 Shading (Know How left here)

The color homogeneity (Color Uniformity) is a large topic with 3-Chip projectors and it voraussichltlich also still for some time will remain still.

As the experience shows, isolates projectors particularly much or in addition, little Shading (color clouds) can to exhibit. For this reason we regarded again several standard sets, in order to find an overview of the work tolerances.

The results are throughout good thereby: Here approximately there easy color temperature fluctuations are to recognize (usually minimum reddish in the right half screen), but are so small the tolerances in in-laminar gray tones that they are not noticeable in the current film picture. The Shading of the devices sighted by us was on an exemplary level.




3,11 result picture

In the preceding sections we treated many aspects for itself. Within most ranges the JVC DLA-HD1 made a very good to outstanding figure. But to which for a picture impression all this help the projector, how each aspect contributes its part?

We begin with the colors, with which the spirit of some home cinema fans (again once) will separate: The color area of the projector was designed not stubbornly for the video standard, but orients themselves at that much larger color area of the cinema original. With cinema there are now times stronger and stronger colors, than they permit our video standards, which are to due to a large extent to outdated tube technology. The LCOS technology offers however the Potenzial for strong colors, so that one did not want to give away her with the HD1 artificially. Some will state here as criticism the fact that (Hp)DVDs for so a large color area was not gemastert, then a too strong representation of some colours is inevitable. Actually the HD1 is inclined also to represent colors very strongly one succeeds to him much believe will representation of nature and face colors, the outstanding tuning of the color temperature contributes however nevertheless to it. The friend of strong colors will answer that the adjustment of the cinema original already represents a rough Verfremdung of the original on the small video color area of itself and with akkurater color reproduction not too much to do has, the JVC variant to the criticism this bad state only against would work. A generally accepted "wisdom" to this topic will not probably give it. Fact is however that the straight current LCOS projectors color variety with naturalness combine impressing. In the case of the DLA-HD1 however a Color management would have been desirable, so that the experienced user can put on hand, in order to realize its personal desires. In this preisklasse such adjustment possibilities are actually standard.

With the very much responding color representation a sayful high native contrast of 15000:1 with the HD1, which can be actually also achieved in practice, associates. No other projector at the market has such a high native contrast, so that the first picture impression of the HD1 affects also on the experienced eye a large fascination. Particularly predominantly dark scenes with at the same time bright picture elements profit. By the high in image contrast the HD1 is competitionless in such scenes. With many scenes the ANSI contrast is by far less crucial, than the native on/off contrast, the HD1 occupies this in impressing way. We will publish their own Special row to the topic soon.
By the very good gamma tuning ex factory the projector succeeds in also bringing the unbelievable picture depth reliably and naturally on the canvas. However applies also here: Adjustment possibilities lacking specify the user on factory setting, own optimizations can not be accomplished.

Apart from above main criteria the HD1 affords few weaknesses also in many partial aspects of the image representation. With the D-ILA technology the absence of any digital artifacts is particularly beautiful, so that the picture on the Leiwand the Zellulloid original comes astonishing close. As some little thing disturbs however, as the not influenceable Overscan, the projector of more adjusting parameters also here would not have harmed. Disturbing the inadequacies are therefore real with HDMI 576p (YUV) signals, the user should absolutely make certain that he uses RGB suited Zuspieler.


Small weaknesses or ago, the DLA-HD1 impresses with his image representation, like hardly a projector before. The combination of grandiosen colors and unique picture depth produce even with home cinema fans for many years an AHA effect, like never before. We were allowed to experience this with several presentations of the Beamers. There is probably nobody, which does not certify the HD1 a good picture, and this succeeded practically still to no other Beamer before.


Evaluation picture entirely: 1,3 (very much property -)

Schwarzwert & contrast
       

1,0 (very much property)

Sharpness & interpolation
(because of Chromabug)
       

1,4 - 4.3 (very much property to sufficient)

Color extent/temperature
       

1,3/1.2 (very well -)

De-Interlacing
       

1,6 (property +)

Other aspects
       

1,3 (very much property)

(all evaluations refer to the respective kind of projection and the current state of the art. A direct system-spreading comparison is only conditionally possible therefore!)





4. Result

After the so far always rather halfhearted attempts of a home cinema projector the manufacturer JVC wanted to make this time nails with heads. A goal was a projector, which was adapted in all interests on the needs of the home cinema.

This ambitious project succeeded on whole line. This begins with the mad processing and the noble exterior that directly the feeling of a high-quality product for the customer arrange. Unfortunately the finish failed a little too empfindlcih, it dusty and scratched very easily.


Also the need of the Heimkinfans after peace was taken good heed of, because in normally the mode the HD1 behaves pleasantly quietly and disturbs the film evening in keinster way. Only who would like to use all Lichtreserevn, does not come around around a certain noise insensitivity, because in the High mode the ventilation adds a course.


Compromise lot shows up the projector also in its list flexibility: With a very large zoom shot range and a just as large optical Lensshift in both directions the HD1 is the LCSO projector at the market, most flexible with distance. Also unusual positions can be mastered with it problem-free. A little unfortunate is however the absence of any luxury, then all attitudes must become manual vorgenommwn, whereby the Lensshift works besides a little wobbly. So some competitor offers in this preisklasse more comfort.


With two HDMI the HD1 is appropriate for entrances and the support of 1080p/24Hz signals likewise fully in the indication the time. It finished HDTV material and is so on years usable. Hardly another model can maintain this at present from itself. Unfortunate however the "Geiz" is with PC supports: No similar VGA entrance and no support of PC dissolutions (except VGA) limit the projector on pure video representations. It is possible nevertheless to connect a PC by HDMI with suitable dissolution (1920x1080) but in addition only heavy-duty machines are at present able, not however the usual Notebook.


Over the resulting image quality already everything is said: The JVC DLA-HD1 is a projector, which projects a compromiseless, fascinating picture, like hardly equipment before. And this "out OF the box", everything without large Nachkorrekturen by the user. "fascinating" is all around the suitable word, because fascination is written everyone in the face, which regards the picture of the HD1 for the first time on the canvas. Who may admire the picture of the HD1 in the suitable premises, him also fast or other inadequacy in the equipment forgives.

Therefore we can only recommend an attendance with the specialist dealer and the associated personal demonstration to everyone, which is interested at present in that perfect home cinema picture. Also you will be fascinated, that guarantee we!



5. Evaluation

+ Full HDTV dissolution (1920 x 1080)
+ outstanding factory settings
+ unique high native contrast
+ strengthens colors
+ high-quality signal processing
+ no pixel structure
+ no digital artifacts
+ very flexible list characteristics
+ Grandiose pair of overalls image quality
+ property work tolerances

- Chroma Upsampling error with 576p/i signals (4:2:2)
- few picture parameters to persoenlcihen optimization
- no motorized zoom shot, focus or Lens SHIFT
- imprecise Lens SHIFT mechanics
- no support of usual dissolutions of PC
- little similar entrances, no VGA
- no influence possibilities for the Overscan

Evaluation entirely: 1,4 (very much property -)

Equipment
       

1,7 (property +)

Operation
       

1,7 (property +)

Technology
       

1,2 (very much property)

Picture
       

1,3 (very much property -)

Price achievement
       

1,0 (very much property)

(all evaluations refer to the respective kind of projection and the current state of the art. A direct system-spreading comparison is only conditionally possible therefore!)



26. February, 2007, corner-hard Schmitt



Inquiry - voices it now off!!
With one click co-ordinate you:



- > I prefer the white version of the DLA-HD1... < -




- > I prefer the black version of the DLA-HD1... < -




- > the color is all the same to me... < -







6. Technical details (manufacturer data)

Display DEVICE
       

Full hp D-ILA DEVICE

Panel size
       

0,7 inch of x 3 (16:9)

Resolution
       

1.920 x 1.080 of pixel

Lens
       

X2 manual zoom shot/focus lens

f=21.3-42.6mm

F=3.2-4.3

Projection size
       

60 inch – 200 inch

Lens SHIFT function
       

80% vertically and 34% horizontal

Light SOURCE lamp
       

200-watt ultra high pressure mercury lamp

Light output
       

700 lm

Contrast ratio
       

15,000:1

Video input terminal
       

HDMI x 2

Component x 1 (3RCA) CAN thus used as A RGB terminal.

S video terminal (mini DIN4 pin) x 1

Composite x 1 (1RCA terminal)

Control terminal
       

RS-232 (D-sub9 pin)

Video input of signal
       

480i/p, 576i/p, 720p60/50, 1080i60/50, 1080p60/50/24, NTSC/NTSC4.43/PAL/PAL-M/PAL-N/SECAM

Noise level
       

25dB (in normally mode)

Power Consumption
       

280-watt (2.7-watt while in by)

Dimension (W x H x D)
       

455 x 172 x 418mm (without extruding)

Measure
       

11.6kg

Provided of accessories
       

Power SOURCE cable x 1, self lightening remote control x 1, AAA size batteries, and lens cap




To the main side of www.Cine4Home.de
回覆 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報


發表於 2007-3-1 06:50:29 | 顯示全部樓層
後來用google 翻, 可以直接連接,
有圖的還是比較好看.
有興趣的試試看吧!

"http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cine4home.de%2Ftests%2Fprojektoren%2FJVC-HD1%2FHD1Test.htm&langpair=de%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&prev=%2Flanguage_tools"

<font color="#000066">[這篇文章最後由Jeff Hsu在 2007/03/01 21:17:34 編輯]</font>
回覆 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報


發表於 2007-3-1 17:26:06 | 顯示全部樓層
這一台,在myav的企鵝已經注意很久了,一些國產旗艦dlp都可以不用考慮了,即使是分離式的.況且,價位已經殺到二十萬左右(比optoma HD-81還便宜)
真期待她的傳言被證實<img src="snitz/emot/em27.gif" border=0>
回覆 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報


發表於 2007-3-1 20:39:21 | 顯示全部樓層
不歸的敗家 之路...
終極誘惑出現了
回覆 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報


發表於 2007-3-2 05:19:26 | 顯示全部樓層
http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/trurl_pagecontent?lp=de_en&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cine4home.de%2Ftests%2Fprojektoren%2FJVC-HD1%2FHD1Test.htm
回覆 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報


發表於 2007-3-2 08:30:32 | 顯示全部樓層
這是原網頁的電腦翻譯。 它只能作為一般資訊之用,不能確保其一定完整或正確無誤。  
測試: D-ILA放映機JVC DLA-HD1

LCOS Kontrastwunder在Cine4Home硬化了,
它能真正地做什麼?

對萬維網的主要邊。Cine4Home.de  





最後到目前為止現在是它: 在我們的二大預覽我們的第一個標準集合的大詳細的測試最後跟隨專輯和世界第一種測試結果之後,在許多國家導致大共鳴,在這個星期:
在最後月LCOS技術在高結尾是建立的範圍: 許多年它帶領了「Mauerbl&uuml;mchendasein」,但索尼在輾壓帶來了石頭與Qualia004、VPL-VW100和VPL-VW50 : 在國內四牆壁也第一次顯示的,為圖像質量他們能可以是, LCOS放映機。

競爭給事務賦予生命和因而可能JVC,然而D-ILA技術的發明者和因而聯接LCOS時代的創建者,不兩次請求用它自己的家庭戲院放映機回答對索尼變形。 結果是JVC DLA-HD1,自稱以對市場的大大鼓衝擊。 然而它的位置特徵是sayful高當地對比15000 :1,那沒有其他投射技術,仍然LCD或DLP是否被到達。 這個高當地對比是做自己直接地在被支付的圖片。 JVC申請HD1作為其中一臺最塑料的錄影放映機在市場上。



以我們的出勤與JVC在Friedberg我們可能說服在12月已經放映機的異常的質量。 我們報告關於它在我們的二大預覽專輯,已經說服的第一個結果。 但在這個詳細的測試我們現在審查標準集合是否也舉行,許諾試驗全部。 有些改變? 多麼確切地是實踐上將被評估的HD1的表現? 工作容忍多麼大? 在所有這些問題我們在這Testspecial詳述的答復將設法給。


我們詳細事先提到我們的測試標準,那些在我們的技術特別: 「放映機或PlasmaTVs -質量標準- Cine4Home測試標準」 被描述。

有關。 此外我們提到LCOS技術我們的技術特別: 「D-ILA技術- LCOS放映機作用方式介紹」.




1. 設備和技術 (知道 怎麼這裡離開)

HD1不是第一臺放映機從房子JVC,為家庭戲院市場意味。 在它那裡已經是HX1/2和第一FullHD Beamer在德國市場上之前, HD2K。 技術所有這些設備被說服,而是被標記的一個對他們那在他們的建築期間以家庭戲院風扇你的需要真正地沒有成交。

因而所有前輩顯示了一臺常規介紹放映機的一個非常簡單設計,相似地那。 他們簡單地太大聲是一張小的名單靈活而不是最少為家用。 因而概念「D-ILA家庭戲院放映機」已經失靈由於實踐堅固基地,雖然放映機定性地是在每懷疑之外。

明顯JVC對它博學的工程師,因為與HD1所有這些缺乏&#23558;關閉。 這已經出現以放映機的向外出現: 而不是在典型的「介紹底盤」看起來以高尚的設計和黑色結束:



設計也許少許出故障,但簡單地典雅地運作它并且應該以它多數口味集會。 同樣在高級處理DLA-HD1說謊: 它運作它的Preisklasse (UVP : ? 6500.-)相應地優質和獲得一個穩定的印象。 上部和側向結束包括高波蘭亮漆結束,引起典型的鋼琴亮漆印象。



前面並且控制板在頂端是引起的銀并且形成一個反應的對比在住房。


DLA-HD1的銀前面


透氣屏幕,陳列蜂蜂窩結構,這裡是一點適應貧窮它更加典雅的解答在我們的口味以後將給。


那麼高尚地黑色或銀設計也工作喜歡,它必要實踐上不是客廳兼容: 在邊一臺黑放映機在白色蓋子之下,在另一邊是相當卓越的是黑上流擦亮劑結束非常塵土因此,并且抓痕敏感,規則閃光和仔細處理是更比適當的。

在我們的Previewspecial我們要求我們的讀者他們是否將更喜歡一個白色版本,作為他們是可利用的在日本。 然而這個版本同樣運作光學上非常典雅地,由明亮外部更好適應正常客廳。



我們的讀者討論的到目前為止百分之八十從而為白色版本,而是它的慾望不是不幸地erh&ouml;rt : 在它在這個國家保持以黑版本的歐洲,白色變形除非另行通知沒有被介紹。 我們考慮這個決定錯誤,因為那麼一些家庭戲院風扇相當經常也將逃避,為了緣故配偶緣故,比「KO標準」分類黑外部,和在其他標記白色模型。


然而總之設計和處理是作為選定的表達的成功,放映機也斡旋了向外它高效率。



1.1技術 (知道 怎麼這裡離開)

與D-ILA投射它在常規感覺不有關LCD和DLP技術。 這裡半新的LCOS技術寧可代表一個混合物從兩個: 像這裡也盒為LCD技術小液晶為想像保證,但沒有分析他們,而是反射光,相似地和以DLP技術。 像盒為LCD放映機它同樣有關3芯片技術,為三個盤區的每種基本的顏色一是在使用中。 這技術團結兩個競爭技術的好處: 由reflektive大廈方法導電性小條不在光學道路,藉以沒有可認識的映像點結構的sayful高填裝的率是可能的。 因為機械運動這裡,不發生填裝的率也清楚地是高在DLP對面。 除D-ILA以外控制發生相似,藉以DLP典型的人工製品,像噪聲或錯誤等高,被避免。 因而所有技術工作的D-ILA投射最自然地和正像相似地一樣,作為影片原物。

誰更加確切地希望自己訓練入D-ILA技術的作用方式,我們的罐頭作為出發點 HD1預覽特別 用途,那裡我們技術結構並且詳細被提出的HD1的創新。



像我們總敢了看法裡面放映機,事實它在測試之時有關唯一的進入的德國,有我們從而被銘記的一點; -)

DLA-HD1的蓋子可以在鬆懈有些螺絲以後簡單地被去除,到出現來內部技術結構:



在圖片Projektionsoptik從我們已經被去除了以上。 房間在它之後在光學塊給一個觀點與周圍的D-ILA盤區(可認識從幅射器箱子)


D-ILA盤區


由屏幕金屬板在保護了信號電子左邊放映機,比與其他D-ILA模型沉澱這次極大地更加緊湊地。


HD1的被裝箱的電子

並且對這個地方我們在裡面,被保留的不盡的扁形電纜在手冒一個看法的風險我們「腦子」放映機後。


上部和較低表面那
HD1-Steuerelektronik



電子的心臟是Gennum VXP處理器,是借好特殊結垢和DeInterlacingeigenschaften對Beamer。 它是卓越和做廣告有效在中部在被安置的板材。



多麼恰當VXP芯片在DLA-HD1進行它的工作,圖片測試其間,我們將審查,但它的電話更比好第一已經是。


除新的光學結構和新的信號電子之外HD1是由特別安靜的透氣也發光。 從而技術認識是有趣: 像馬掌空氣管道拉扯自己作為週期由放映機。


HD1的透氣週期



冷卻空氣權利被吮光學(1),對角鱗片這裡提供Sichtschutz。 新鮮空氣冷卻第一信號電子(2)並且電源組,在它之下。 在後面空氣U形在燈被繼續操縱,被安置在後方左邊(3),在空氣再被加熱葉子放映機(4)之前。 為進一步例證我們打開了黑空氣管道:



尾氣,可能由它慷慨的維度移動空氣(由於HD1的大住房,變得可看見)與適度Umlaufzahl。 在直接鄰里燈坑和光學道路的第一個積分器透鏡。


圖片中心: 燈坑用積分器透鏡
權利或下來: 尾氣


在燈之下(這裡被發展)是溫度傳感器,保護燈免受過度加熱(箭頭)。 直接地在通過以後燈給加熱的空氣被吹放映機。


殷勤讀者注意這個透氣週期不冷卻放映機的光學塊。 認為大塵土危險聯合的透氣也是非常危險的。 這裡也學會的另外一: 冷卻空氣必要為「光學引擎」由它自己的尾氣吮從放映機較低表面。 尾氣從而垂直地是platziert除光學之外:


尾氣為光學塊

如果你投擲放映機較低表面的看法,你發現適當的進水閘。 它受一個細濾清器的保護反對干擾的塵土。


透氣槽孔用恰當過濾器


然而空氣濾清器在較低表面必要經常做一aufw&auml;ndige拆卸Deckenhalterung,沒有與HD1。 這裡也設計想法結束,因為過濾器可以從放映機簡單地側向地被拉扯,不用此必須移動。 因而什么都不站立到過濾器的規則清潔就像。


以光源它在200W-Variante附近行動出於日本著陸,為了它對JVC一個新的合作夥伴是,因為通過製造商不會履行質量要求足&#22815;一貫地。



燈模塊不凡地是緊湊和為Heimkinobeamer幾乎典型。 事實是中意的可以如果需要也改變它舒適地,&#26080;需鬆開放映機從它的彙編。 坑在邊,并且可以在鬆懈螺絲以後被打開。



簡單的燈變動與HD1


你多頻繁必須計數這樣燈變動? 根據製造商用於HD1的變形有大約2000個小時一壽命。 在這時間以後它大約仍然供應。 50%他們原始的光度,不直接地因而是瑕疵的。 然而這壽命是當前平均與Heimkinobeamern,可能不由燈儲款方式是延長的。 我們與工程師講了話對此: 如果燈被管理「在目標之下」,燈製造商在任何情況下不保證更長的終身。 你決定也表明在燈壽命誠實的價值。 我們相當經常認為這次誠實的行動模範,在文件夾然而長的終身將過高被許諾,&#20165;保證到幾百個小時。


到目前為止并且多麼大聲或安靜地在通風系統, JVC工作之上不是為安靜的放映機知名? 我們可以給『所有清楚的』信號,在通常方式是可聽見的透氣,但在影片企業中不干擾,即使你坐緊密在設備。 HD1毫無疑問屬於安靜它的種類。 然而它在「高次模式下」大聲變得,這也清楚地可聽見和為有些耳朵放映機令人困擾。 然而另外的輕的儲備為大帆布寬度&#20165;使用2,8m。


一共JVC-HD1的技術結構是正優質,作為它的外部出現。 處理也在裡面模範,一切穩定地工作,乾淨地被安排和純謹被保護。 因為在後面透氣槽孔不,通風系統也是durchdacht和做的可能的positionings接近在後方牆壁。 二進制通風系統,供應說謊的轉每秒引擎擁有,塵土保護了冷卻空氣,是非常稱讚價值。 與光學塊的&#32477;對優質封閉一起塵土問題不&#23558;這裡期望。 燈坑和空氣濾清器的實用可及性好印象增加的容量在高燈方式下,消極地只評估我們圓。



1.2個連接或圖片信號 (知道 怎麼這裡離開)

與入口你集中了主要數字信號傳輸。 放映機提議等值二HDMI (1。2) 入口,因此幾個設備可以同時也附上數字式地。



在數字式入口旁邊是存在通常模式變形、組分(YUV), S錄影和綜合。 要批評這裡是每個入口只一次存在。 並且放映機有入口沒有分開的VGA (RGB) -,因此為個人計算機的連接與數字式入口必須退回。 因為也今天,每臺個人計算機或膝上計算機沒有數字式圖片出口,製造商可能這裡是「更加慷慨的」小。 除放映機以外不支持個人計算機的任何溶解, XGA,和SXGA,寂靜的SVGA。 因而一必需它的個人計算機在錄影溶解(1280x720或1920x1080)修剪,為了能射出與HD1桌面。


靈活的視頻信號支持是中意的: 480i/p, 576i/p, 720p60/50, 1080i60/50, 1080p60/50/24可能處理放映機。 平直在1080p/24處理(HDMI) 「Pulldown Hasser」在HD-DVD和藍色光芒時代將是喜悅的更多比。


以我們的拆卸我們也更加確切地審查了入口板。 一個被偽裝的服務避風港是引人註目的對我們,由許多雙列直插式封裝開關伴隨。


入口板與神奇服務避風港



然而技術畸形人不應該做自己錯誤希望: 在咨詢以後與JVC我們體驗了事實消費者軟件為這個避風港沒有計劃,因為對設備的裡面這裡退回太多。 反而你考慮軟件,你可能調整更加進一步的圖片參量在RS-232避風港。



1.3名單 (知道 怎麼這裡離開)

因為不同的空間綜合化使經常特別地方 彙編必要,一臺現代放映機一定是靈活的。 一些區域 要求一個短的距離,其他一個大,再不同名單在邊緣,從Z-axis。 這裡我們比正面地驚奇是更多HD1的新的特徵。 相反對它的前輩HD1提供一個不凡地大徒升射擊範圍,一很甚而大高於一切DLP競爭這裡不到來其中任一長期:


間隔號桌JVC DLA-HD1



當你可能從上述間隔號桌推斷,放映機提供一個sayful大徒升射擊範圍。 如此顯示寬度z,通常在家庭戲院,罐頭。B. 2,7m已經從從3,6m的一個距離(!!)將體會。 另外,在更大的區域7,3m距離是可能的以同樣維度圖像面積。 放映機的徒升射擊範圍更加靈活地不必須是。


DLA-HD1的光學,
它使大徒升射擊範圍成為可能




並且到透鏡轉移你認為這次。 這主要同樣沉澱sayful并且清楚地觸擊競爭者VPL-VW50。



80%在高度和34%在寬度可以由軌轉移放映機。 平直的水平位移範圍&#23558;那麼主要發現沒有其他FullHD放映機。 與大徒升射擊範圍JVC結合這裡設置完全地清楚新的碼尺。 DLA-HD1是無問題可適用的在幾乎任何區域!


然而有軍事勇氣下落: 徒升射擊、焦點和Lensshift&#23558;只手工服務,豪華徒然和與索尼VPL-VW50或三菱HC5000尋找一。 除透鏡轉移以外HD1的機械工是解決的只滿意。 它是一少許精確的,并且「部分跳躍」以輪子的自轉,而不是行動sensitivly。 除de Raderr以外非常有戲劇。


透鏡HD1的轉移機械工

觀點的技工澄清這些弱點: 傳輸從許多Plastikr&auml;dern不留下特別優質印象,鎖是缺掉的。 所以你必須帶來一點耐心,為了對帆布排列HD1。 然而一旦調整光學不調整自己。



在我們的第一個測試章節HD1在幾乎整體線說服: 反應和優質工作外部,卓著的被設計的內部結構和你銘記名單靈活性對應於當前要求,你可能安置反對到結束這Preisklasse的Beamer上流。 手工光學態度、&#20165;缺乏個人計算機入口和溶解並且容量在高燈方式下覆蓋否則推出的印象。




2. 操作 (這裡被留下的技術)

操作是每臺放映機一個堅固質量因素,這裡必須調整品種和清晰的優選的組合總被命令。 什么都不令人沮喪,好像你不可能影響多餘地複雜的圖片或操作沉澱物的某些方面。


2.1遠程維護

通過我們測試的D-ILA放映機沒有發光直接以他們的遠程維護。 他們寧可適合了入口類高結尾設備的放映機。 這一個現在明顯地看見了與JVC,一&#20010;HD-1一特別美好的紅外送禮者spendiert。



清楚地構造遠程維護并且提供意味深長的關鍵分派。 像那樣不同的邊框形式以及所有入口直接地是可贖回的通過壓下鑰匙。 同時稅十字架是被安排的慷慨的。 所有鑰匙可以電子如果需要容光煥發,因此可讀性在黑暗的區域也被保證。 紅外送禮者的範圍&#32477;對模範并且也允許可靠的操作在大區域以就座位置在或在放映機之後之前。


所有堅固控制鍵典雅地直接地在設備頂端也容納。 在遠程維護的空的電池情況下,如此放映機可以也使用。 但小心: 在黑表面你看每個指紋!


控制板在HD1的頂端



2.2份菜單

DLA-HD1的菜單結構是清楚的在六個主要類別, 「圖像」, 「設定」, 「錄影」, 「安裝」, 「收音機。「并且「信息」。 分開。 這不凡地促進航海。 這裡專欄在細節:


2.2.1 「圖像」 -專欄

像名字包含這個專欄已經堅固圖片參量說。 典型的調整的參量,也許是共同的專家,清楚地是一&#20010;在被安排的其他之上:


HD1的「圖像」 -菜單


在Unterrubrik 「圖像調整」是所有根本參量例如對比、亮光,顏色等。 發現。 特此快速的對準線是可能的在信號來源。 作用「鋒利」和「DNR」是特別值得提及,使用的基因優秀醉更正在信號處理附近可以配置。



它繼續同行陪「顏色臨時雇員」 : 這裡一個健康混合物從Werkspresets和擁有調整可能性被定購。 三色溫站立對選擇, 「低」, 「中部」和「高」,藉以中間態度是對應於D65-Kalibrierung,更多對它在圖片測試。 誰希望投入平衡手,色溫可能通過RGB自動控制器影響。 然而當出發點為自己的顏色定標總「高」時,講最大化的所有基本的顏色(缺乏地在剪報邊界之下),為什麼RGB自動控制器在陰性可以也&#20165;安置。 「中間」方式的Nachjustage不因而是可能的,或許為沒有測量儀器的外行將是極大地簡單。 卓越也是放映機不陳列分開的獲取(為明亮範圍)和偏壓(為黑暗的範圍)自動控制器。 反而自動控制器影響所有亮光。 同樣適用自動控制器於被抵銷的「RGB」,這裡也影響一所有亮光階段,然而在更加概略的步。




在何種程度上這些調整可能性為色溫的確切的調整是充足的,取決於線性設備安置。 我們在圖片part.更將審查此詳細。


在「伽瑪」 -同樣不同的邊框形式於對菜單安排,我們在圖片零件儀器工作將同樣佔領。 「法線」被預先設定,應該對應於錄影標準。 擁有伽瑪態度不要是可能的在這份菜單。



在家庭戲院風扇之中是否有討論在最近星期可能分開的伽瑪--軟件將由JVC提供,你可能在個人計算機幫助下編程伽瑪發行。 為兄弟HD2K和HD10K給它這樣軟件。 我們關於這一點舉行了以工程師咨詢: 多麼已經描述在技術之下,消費者軟件特別服務避風港, 「也查找表」沒有被編程,被出版。 開發商當前審查他們是否可以使編程為避風港的伽瑪成為可能在RS232。 機會為此立場很好,而是一個確定聲明或者公告不可能為此被做。


更多最後類別, 「映像點比正面地驚奇調整」我們。 直接一在積土馬力溶解時代相當經常來題目匯合入許多的主要焦點家庭戲院風扇。 完善匯合是實際的在整個圖片用這溶解3芯片放映機每某一烏托邦。 然而匯合在當前影片圖片應該是足&#22815;好,為了挑釁不干擾顏色fringings。 JVC提供前工廠非常小容忍,作為一&#20010;描述了我們。 然而可能性另外被給用戶到影響甚而匯合:


DLA-HD1的匯合菜單

全部三(!)基本的顏色可以是被轉移的水平和垂直和直接地幾個映像點。 然而可能的轉移相等地總是為整個圖片。 比z.是匯合在左邊不同。B. 在右邊,你不會能通過整個圖片到達完善的匯合。 然而然而在這份菜單幫助下它比體會一個半映像點是可能的,在圖片的特別重要部分,為圖片中心,匯合轉移沒有更多。 然而許多家庭戲院風扇將特別喜歡關於選擇,讓他們索尼紅寶石或那麼痛苦地成珠狀錯過。


2.2.2 「被設定的」 -專欄

第二個主要專欄提供存放期望圖片配置的各種各樣的可能性在自己的外形。 另外三Werkspresets是可利用的,自已描述為不同的被瞄準的應用在之前配置。




此外與「HDMI輸入級」能選擇HDMI水平在個人計算機和錄影之間。 並且這個作用不凡地促進調整到信號來源。



它保持作用「面具」 : 原則上DLA-HD1完全地運作在HDTV信號,不用Overscan,因而表明映像點完善整個圖片內容。 然而,如果干擾人工製品在等高是將逐漸消失,然後他們能掩沒以這個作用。 然而這&#20165;適用於馬力信號,與常規SD信號(z。B. PAL)你沒有對Overscan或刪去的任何影響。 另外這是在高結尾Beamer期間不應該是的缺乏,更多在圖片測試。


2.2.3 「錄影」 -專欄

第三個專欄「錄影」提供信號調整的不同方面。 然而可能性很少是不不切實際的指定詳細的數字式圖片信號。 當你在以下看見對屏幕快照,放映機支持RGB和YUV 4 :2:2和4 :4:4編碼。




用「Comp」 -作用可能指定用戶,反對相似的YUV入口YUV是否真正地也發信號休息,或者RGB信號。 因而它也是可能的RGB Scart (z。B. 從Satellitenreceiver哺養)入放映機。 「影片方式」提供選擇在汽車之間和(與說謊的接近的一半圖像信號)。 然而通常你在汽車留下這個作用,與裝DeInterlacer於罐中如果需要入視頻模式是牽強的。
「顏色系統」為(s)視頻信號意味,完全這裡裝於罐中在NTSC, PAL之間,并且Secam如果需要被交換手工。 同樣適用於「暗電平」,相似的暗電平在0和7,5%之間可以受影響。


2.2.4 「安裝」 -專欄

安裝菜單提供自已描述所有相關的選擇為放映機名單。



除前面& R&uuml;ckprojektion之外OSD菜單這裡在可以被整理擁有口味。


2.2.5 「收音機。「-專欄

在第五個類別「作用」出現所有選擇,沒有適合主題成其他專欄。



這裡三個作用特別值得提及: 與「睡眠定時器」用戶能保護放映機免受事實他繼續幾個小時跑在突然的睡眠儲積的情況下和,因此浪費的可貴的燈時間(參見上述)。 我們認為這作用表達的實用并且希望他們在將來也將是更加頻繁發現在其他模型。 用「燈供給」燈亮光動力在「法線之間」另外,并且「上流」可以被交換,更多在圖片測試。 第三個實用作用是「Testpattern」,許多測試圖形卡可以召集,從顏色到圖像定義。 一個內部圖像發生器顯示放映機這D-ILA的專業起源。


2.2.6 「信息」。 -專欄

然而第六個專欄不提供調整的參量,通知用戶關於被投入的信號并且使用了燈時間。







DLA-HD1的控制面一共提供許多作用,為進一步圖片優化是必要的用一個清楚和直覺的被管理的方式。 混合物從必需的邊框形式和擁有調整成功從而和平衡的選擇。 老練的家庭戲院風扇為圖片調整將重要地評估有限的選擇。 比較許多其他放映機HD1的參量減少到必要的極小值。 它強烈因而垂懸出發點,否認對設備安置放映機,可以為圖片準確性體會與DLA-HD1。



3. 圖片測試

現在我們來-有限對這個測試的圖片零件。 在我們已經出版許多結果對試驗全部模型的我們的預覽專輯,它依然是問題, 「製造自己」標準集合,讓我們講模型,你在事務可能買,在比較觸擊。 同時我們有審查三的可能性「真正」標準集合,藉以我們的結果&#23558;充分和最後認為。


3.1 Screendoor或光柵 (這裡被留下的技術)

其中一LCOS的最大的好處並且/或者。 D-ILA技術是盤區的反射的作用,&#26080;需干擾導電性小條在光學道路。 因而映像點一起移動不凡地緊密,因此距離可以幾乎不仍然被注意。


HD1的映像點光柵從少量厘米
距離相片

另外放映機來像JVC二百萬個映像點的高當地決議與FullHD。 微小的映像點和高填裝的率的組合(90%)做HD1一臺幾乎無映像點放映機。 從短的觀看距離飛行格子不&#23558;被認出。



3.2種顏色程度 (這裡被留下的技術)

在事顏色程度沒做了在我們的Previewtest對面: 測量杆在顏色程度上在過去十二個月清楚地被考慮了索尼VPL-VW100。 放映機用它的氙氣燈和它太陽相似的光譜在它的顏色程度上跳過了本身在錄影標準,但平直這在顏色表示法構成了迷戀的一個大部分為許多。

在DLA-HD1發現沒有氙氣燈用途,錢包由清楚地更小的運行費用感謝。 反而200W UHP燈被阻攔了,怎麼它為家庭戲院放映機是通常的。 然而這盞燈提供沒有作為平衡的光譜,作為昂貴和aufw&auml;ndige氙變形。 然而為了將被接受沒有缺乏在顏色, JVC選擇的異常的起點:

在放映機裡面是特別過濾器,讓發生&#20165;選擇的鬼部分過濾UHP光的不受歡迎的鬼部分和。 特殊干擾的黃色部分從綠色被消滅用這樣方式,來顏色表示法到物產。 這樣放映機丟失輕(沒有Farbanpassung HD1是太遠的結束1000Lumen能),但是,一個相似的顏色程度和與將體會的氙。 并且想法方法在我們的測量也被證實了: 放映機實際上有一個不凡地大顏色區域,可能佔去它甚而與索尼紅寶石。


左邊: 顏色程度DLA-HD1,權利: 索尼VPL-VW100 (紅寶石)
二次色在系列很好被協調

在顏色程度相似地主要沉澱的比較,在紅色提議在氙氣燈之上仍然更多清除&#23558;為強的顏色&#20165;被認出。 然而在使用銘記這個結果,是二個完全地不同的燈技術。 然而然而在光譜分析區別出現然後: 已經描述用UHP燈必須干擾鬼部分被過濾,而與氙光譜在帆布可以被射出不幾乎被過濾。


左邊: 光譜分析DLA-HD1,權利: 索尼VPL-VW100 (紅寶石)

當你看見,氙氣燈在它的光譜與大浴盆曲線保持ungeschlagen。 在何種程度上這正面地影響眼睛,不可能用測量儀器佔領。 沒有構成一個可看見的區別的少量錄影純正主義者狀態用氙氣燈在當前影片圖片。 其他再陳述區別不可能可看見是,因為「銳化」基本的顏色敏感地決定對那些我們的特別起反應的眼睛。

我們為我們的部分同樣是觀點氙氣燈做自己仍然被支付的。 JVC HD1提供一個&#32477;對推出的圖像表示法,適當地模仿大戲院色彩光譜。 在錄影標準的Limitationen以它的幾乎「蒼白」基本的顏色你神志清楚地跳過了自己。 然而或其他場面在比較比HD1的地方運作一少許太多彩多姿,氙放映機,如VPL-100成功混合從自然自然顏色并且加強, 「poppigen」顏色,渴望,好。

以題目精神越來越分離顏色區域: 錄影純正主義者將批評事實必需的顏色區域比錄影標準計劃提供更多,和那麼可能surfeited可能工作顏色。 然而電影迷在減少的顏色區域看直接干擾的妥協到戲院原物,同樣陳列一個極大地更大的顏色區域。 無論如何批評一的部分不可能做事實HD1不提供真正的彩色空間調整,講一個顏色管理像這Preisklasse許多其他放映機。 像那一個是固定的在大顏色區域,并且能在一般飽和自動控制器幫助下&#20165;影響他。 不同的顏色區域的選擇將是中意地最小的,他們提供更多放映機在市場上。 然而為影片看HD1的工作選擇是更比可推薦的并且遇見多數家庭戲院風扇口味,那想要給戲院真正地帶來經驗,以所有它的顏色輝煌,家。




3.3色溫 (這裡被留下的技術)

我們的一個喜愛題目是放映機的色溫。 對此圖片的自然根本上依靠,但它的準確性太經常被忽略在設備安置期間有罪。 陪這裡好例子JVC同行,我們測試的每臺D-ILA放映機在前面幾乎完全是以總被協調的D65 (6500K)錄影標準。

為了接受真正地代表性結果,我們通過測量這次等值三標準集合,為了能也認可可能的工作分散作用。 「中部」 -邊框形式根據D65-Videonorm的製造商對應,我們從第一試測器材開始:


「中部」 -第一個標準集合的工廠設置

我們的第一名系列候選人更比銘記工作調整顯示一: 色溫不僅不凡地在他們的期望值附近,而且&#32477;對平衡幾乎所有亮光。 這導致一akkurate,并且同時同類的顏色表示法,更好的前工廠幾乎不去它。 然而或? -規定的第二個標準真正地使我們驚奇:


設備安置第二個標準集合

End of
Translation
  &#24403;第二個標準規定「Fernkalibrierer」運載了整體從日本解決: Der Projektor ist auf den Punkt, genauer kann eine Kalibrierung kaum ausfallen. Lediglich in dunklen Breichen zeigt sich ein minimaler Magenta&uuml;berschuss. Dennoch: Derart gute Ergebnisse bot bisher kaum ein anderer Projektor jemals ab Werk.


Werkseinstellung des dritten Serienger&auml;tes

Bei unserem dritten Testexemplar fiel die Farbtemperatur zwar immer noch gut, aber nicht mehr so perfekt wie bei den anderen zwei aus. Hier macht sich ein kleiner Blau&uuml;berschuss bemerkbar, zumindest f&uuml;r videophile Extremisten.


Soweit die Werkseinstellungen, mit denen sich der HD1 in dieser Kategorie Bestnoten ergattert. Doch wie gut kann man bei Bedarf die Farbtemperatur selbst justieren? In den letzten Wochen waren die begrenzten RGB-M&ouml;glichkeiten f&uuml;r viele ein gro&szlig;es Diskussionsthema. Wir k&ouml;nnen Entwarnung geben: Im Gegenteil, noch nie war es so einfach, die Farbtemperatur eines Projektors so schnell auf den gew&uuml;nschten Punkt zu bringen, wie beim HD1. Es reichte, die Farbtemperatur einer mittleren Helligkeitsstufe (50%) abzustimmen und alle anderen Helligkeitsstufen verhielten sich identisch.


Nachgebesserte Farbtemperatur mit Hilfe der RGB-Regler


Schade ist dabei nur, dass das hervorragende "Middle"-Preset nicht nachkorrigiert werden kann, sondern die "User1/2" Modi als Ausgangsbasis stets das viel zu k&uuml;hle "High"-Preset zugrunde legen. Auch werden die RGB-Werte des Middle-Presets im normalen Men&uuml; nicht angezeigt, so dass man sie auch nicht umkopieren kann. Dennoch: Die Sorgen um die Farbtemperatur-Einstellm&ouml;glichkeiten des HD1 waren unbegr&uuml;ndet.


Im Ergebnis zeigt der Projektor eine nat&uuml;rliche Farbdarstellung, die dem Kino-Original sehr nahe kommt. Die Ausgewogenheit der Grundfarben ist dabei hervorragend gelungen, Farbverschiebungen ins Gr&uuml;ne oder Blaue tauchen nicht auf, auch nicht bei den Sekund&auml;rfarben. Hier und da wirkt der HD1 aber ein wenig zu bunt, was auf den gro&szlig;en Farbraum zur&uuml;ckgef&uuml;hrt werden muss. Der Kompromiss ist unserer Meinung nach aber zu Gunsten der viel sch&ouml;neren "Kinofarben" mehr als akzeptabel. Wer es noch besser will, der muss auf Xenon ausweichen.




3.4 Schwarzwert, Kontrast, Helligkeit (Know How Link hier)

Nun kommen wir zu dem Alleinstellungsmerkmal des DLA-HD1: Sage und schreibe 15000:1 nativen Kontrast soll der Beamer auf die Leinwand bannen, das ist rund eine Verdreifachung des bisher M&ouml;glichen, egal welche Projektionstechnik.

Ein Wert, der zu sch&ouml;n klingt, um wahr zu sein. Aus diesem Grund haben wir besonders genau gemessen und uns wiederum alle drei Serienger&auml;te vorgekn&ouml;pft. Die Ergebnisse dabei waren &uuml;berzeugend: Tats&auml;chlich erreicht der HD1 diese Werksangabe, und das sogar bei Einhaltung der D65-Videonorm, sprich bei korrekten Farben. Es gibt aber ein paar Details zu beachten: So hat der Zoom einen direkten Einfluss auf Kontrast und Helligkeit. Je n&auml;her man den Projektor an die Leinwand stellt (je gr&ouml;&szlig;er der Zoom), desto mehr Licht hat man auf der Leinwand, desto geringer ist aber der Kontrast. Stellt man den Projektor bei gleicher Bildgr&ouml;&szlig;e weiter weg (kleiner Zoom), desto besser wird Schwarzwert und Kontrast, aber man hat auch weniger Maximalhelligkeit auf der Leinwand.


Kontrast / Helligkeit - Messtabelle
JVC DLA-HD1

Zoom Farbmodus Lampenmodus Licht / Lumen  Kontrast
     
Max Mittel (D65)  High 720 12000:1
Max High High 808 14000:1
Max Mittel (D65)  Normal 600 12000:1
Max High Normal 670 14000:1
     
Mid Mittel (D65)  High 615 13500:1
Mid High High 695 15900:1
Mid Mittel (D65)  Normal 520 13500:1
Mid High Normal 590 15900:1
     
Min Mittel (D65)  High 500 15700:1
Min High High 541 19300:1
Min Mittel (D65)  Normal 408 15700:1
Min High Normal 465 19300:1


Wie man der Tabelle entnehmen kann, bietet der maximale Zoom rund 25% mehr Helligkeit, als der minimale Zoom. Gleichzeitig ist aber beim minimalen Zoom der Kontrast um ebenfalls rund 25% besser. Hier kann der Anwender, wenn es der Raum zul&auml;sst, selbst bestimmen, welche Gewichtung er haben will. Ein guter Kompromiss ist stets eine Aufstellung im mittleren Zoombereich.

Wir haben uns mit JVC &uuml;ber dieses Ph&auml;nomen unterhalten. Grund f&uuml;r diese gro&szlig;en Unterschiede ist eine Kombination aus extrem gro&szlig;em Zoombereich der Optik und der festen Iris im Brennpunkt. Es stimmt n&auml;mlich keinesfalls, dass der HD1 &uuml;ber keinerlei Blende im Lichtweg verf&uuml;gt, wie in manchen Tests f&auml;lschlich behauptet. Im Brennpunkt der Optik, befindet sich eine feste Streulichtblende, die den In-Bild-Kontrast deutlich erh&ouml;ht.


Streulichtblende in der Optik


In den gro&szlig;en "Profi-Br&uuml;dern" des HD1 passt sich die Blende mechanisch dem eingestellten Zoom an und erlaubt so stets gleichen Kontrast und Helligkeit. Im HD1 wurde aber eine statische Blende verbaut, so dass obige Toleranzen in Bezug auf den Zoom als normal anzusehen sind.


Bez&uuml;glich der Messergebnisse m&ouml;chten wir erw&auml;hnen, dass sie bei allen von uns getesteten Serienger&auml;ten sehr konstant und gleichartig ausfielen (+/- ein paar Prozent). Somit wird hier auch in der Serie eine gute Konstanz geboten, die den Werksangaben entspricht. Erneut muss man JVC f&uuml;r seine Ehrlichkeit ein gro&szlig;es Lob aussprechen.


Der hohe native Kontrast des JVC-Projektors soll gegen&uuml;ber adaptiven Iris-L&ouml;sungen, wie zum Beispiel beim Sony VPL-VW50, Vorteile bringen. "Wieso das?" wird sich so mancher Leser fragen, "On / Off Kontrast ist gleich On / Off Kontrast". Dies stimmt in der Praxis allerdings nicht ganz. Folgendes Diagramm soll den Unterschied deutlich machen:



Links ist das Kontrastverh&auml;ltnis des JVC schematisch dargestellt, es betr&auml;gt stets 15000:1. Das hei&szlig;t, der Schwarzpegel ist stets gleich dunkel, der Wei&szlig;pegel stets gleich hell. Rechts ist die adaptive Arbeitsweise einer Blende erl&auml;utert. Sie schlie&szlig;t sich bei dunklen Szenen und verbessert den Schwarzwert. In hellen Szenen &ouml;ffnet sie sich und verbessert die Maximalhelligkeit. Was aber stets unver&auml;ndert bleibt ist der native Kontrast des Projektors, der im Falle des VW50 zum Beispiel zwischen 2000:1 und 4000:1 liegt (je nach &Ouml;ffnungsgrad). Mit anderen Worten: In ein und demselben Bild kann Wei&szlig; h&ouml;chstens 3000 mal heller sein als Schwarz. Beim DLA-HD1 kann Wei&szlig; aber 15000 mal heller sein, als Schwarz. Entweder sind helle Details in einer &uuml;berwiegend dunklen Szene also heller, oder der Schwarzwert ist besser.

Diese Theorie ist mehr als einleuchtend, kann aber in dieser Form skeptisch betrachtet werden. Denn sie l&auml;sst diverse Streulichtfaktoren au&szlig;er Acht, die den In-Bild Kontrast unweigerlich reduzieren. Auch mit einem nativen Kontrast von 15000:1 wird in den meisten Szenen ein Projektor niemals einen Kontrast von 15000:1 innerhalb eines Bildes halten k&ouml;nnen. Die ANSI-Kontrastmessung ist dabei ein gutes Beispiel: Bei einem projizierten Schachbrett entspricht der Kontrast zwischen wei&szlig;en und schwarzen Feldern niemals dem On / Off Kontrast, sondern stets nur einem Bruchteil, meistens zwischen 250:1 und 600:1.

Dennoch: Tats&auml;chlich waren die Vorteile des nativen Kontrastes im direkten Vergleich deutlich zu sehen. Gerade in dunklen Szenen profitierte die Bildtiefe sichtbar. W&auml;hrend der Schwarzwert auf leicht besserem Niveau als beim VPL-VW50 lag, wurden helle Details zeitgleich wesentlich strahlender herausgearbeitet. Deutlich wurde dies z.B. bei einem Sternenhimmel aus Star-Wars, die Sterne waren deutlich strahlender als bei dem SXRD-Projektor, der Kontrast zwischen schwarzem Weltraum und hellen Leuchtpunkten wurde wesentlich deutlicher herausgearbeitet. Das folgende Raumschiff wirkte ebenfalls deutlich strahlender, das Bild gewann zunehmend an Bildtiefe. Diese Beobachtung lie&szlig; sich auf viele Szenen &uuml;bertragen. Auch in helleren TV-Szenen war stellenweise die plastischere Herausarbeitung von Details dank h&ouml;herem In-Bild-Kontrast deutlich bemerkbar.


Obiger Vergleich kommt dem Eindruck vor Ort sehr nahe:
Der HD1 (rechts) hat Kontraste gerade in dunklen Szenen besser heraus gearbeitet


Dazu muss gesagt werden, dass es sich bei dem Projektionsbild des VPL-VW50 um ein ungemein plastisches Bild handelt. Der Sony Projektor geh&ouml;rt derzeit mit zum Referenzstandard im Heimkino und bietet alles andere als ein flaues Bild. Viele sind von der Bildtiefe des Sony-Beamers bereits begeistert. Dennoch gelingt es dem JVC DLA-HD1, noch "einen drauf zu setzen". Der Projektor ist noch plastischer, Kontraste werden noch besser herausgearbeitet. Dies zeigt, auf welchem hohen Niveau wir uns hier bewegen. Keine Frage, in Sachen Kontrast setzt der neue JVC-Projektor neue Ma&szlig;st&auml;be, und dies nicht nur in Bezug auf seinen direkten Konkurrenten, sondern in Bezug auf alle derzeit g&auml;ngigen Techniken im Heimkinobereich. Man muss aber auch dazu sagen, dass die Unterschiede nicht wie Tag und Nacht sind, es ist aber ein sichtbarer Schritt von "Gut+" auf "Sehr Gut".

In Sachen nativer Kontrast hat JVC nicht zuviel versprochen. Der HD1 geh&ouml;rt mit Abstand zu den plastischsten Heimkinobeamern, die es gibt - und das schlie&szlig;t alle Technologien ein.




3.5 Gammaverteilung / Homogenit&auml;t (Know How Link hier)

Wie gut sch&ouml;pft der DLA-HD1 seinen hohen Kontrast aus, sprich, wie gut ist die Helligkeitsverteilung (Gamma) "programmiert"? &Auml;hnlich wie bei der Farbtemperatur m&uuml;ssen hier Normen eingehalten werden, um einen m&ouml;glichst plastischen und nat&uuml;rlichen Bildeindruck zu erzielen.

Wie bereits unter Bedienung erl&auml;utert, bietet der HD1 derzeit nur vier Werkspresets f&uuml;r die Gammabeeinflussung, ein Gamma-Manager ist noch nicht offiziell angek&uuml;ndigt. Wir haben die vier Presets untersucht:


Werkseinstellung ist Gamma Off, sprich "natives" Projektoren Gamma, hier haben wir zur Untersuchung der Serienstreuung drei Ger&auml;te getestet.


Gamma-Werkspreset (normal)


Zwei unserer Testmodelle wiesen dabei ein vorbildliches 2.26-Gamma auf, wie im Messdiagramm oben zu erkennen. Eines der Ger&auml;te bot ein leicht h&ouml;heres Gamma von 2,3. Es ist also anzunehmen, dass die Toleranz hier ein Gamma zwischen 2,2 und 2,3 zul&auml;sst. Dies ist f&uuml;r ein Werkspreset hervorragend, entspricht es doch der praktischen Videonorm und erlaubt so die nat&uuml;rlichste Bilddarstellung.

Weiter geht es mit dem n&auml;chsten Preset, das leider nichts sagend "A" genannt wurde. Wie verh&auml;lt sich der Projektor hier?


Gammapreset "A"

Auch hier zeigt sich zun&auml;chst eine vorbildlich gleichm&auml;&szlig;ige 2,24-Gammakurve, es scheint kaum eine Ver&auml;nderung zu geben. Tats&auml;chlich bleibt die Bilddarstellung weitgehend unver&auml;ndert, aber mit einem Unterschied: Dunkle Bildelemente nah an Schwarz werden hervorgehoben und st&auml;rker herausgearbeitet. Damit ist es m&ouml;glich, in nicht optimierten R&auml;umen mehr Durchzeichnung in dunklen Bildern zu erreichen. Wer sich die Messdiagramme genau ansieht wird dies auch dort ablesen k&ouml;nnen: Der Anfang der Kurve (links) liegt beim "A"-Setting h&ouml;her als bei "normal".


Wenig Sinnvolles bringen die Settings "B" und "C", bei ersterem wird das Gamma leicht angehoben, wodurch die Durchzeichnung leidet, aber die Bildplastizit&auml;t nicht steigt. "C" hingegen ist ein flacheres Gamma, das wohl f&uuml;r Projektionen unter Restlichtbedingungen gedacht ist.


Mit den beiden Werkspresets "Normal" und "A" bietet der DLA-HD1 in jedem Heimkino ein ungemein plastisches Bild, das sich vorbildlich an die Videonorm h&auml;lt. Keine Details werden im Dunklen verschluckt, nichts wirkt k&uuml;nstlich &uuml;berstrahlt, hier gibt es nichts auszusetzen. Schwierig wird es, wenn der Anwender ein steileres Gamma realisieren m&ouml;chte, um die subjektive Plastizit&auml;t des Bildes zu erh&ouml;hen. Dies ist derzeit mit dem HD1 nicht m&ouml;glich!



3.6 Sch&auml;rfe / Ausleuchtung / Konvergenz (Know How Link hier)

Bei FullHD ist die optische Sch&auml;rfe der Projektion besonders wichtig geworden. Das Bild kann nur dann die hohe Aufl&ouml;sung des Bildsignals umsetzen, wenn die Sch&auml;rfe der Optik dies zul&auml;sst. Auch die Abstimmung der drei Grundfarben aufeinander, sprich Konvergenz, muss m&ouml;glichst genau sein.


Die Projektionsoptik des HD1


Die Optik des HD1 leistet hier gute Arbeit, sie gew&auml;hrleistet &uuml;ber das gesamte Bild eine gleichm&auml;&szlig;ige Sch&auml;rfe, die auch feinste Details angemessen aufl&ouml;st. Nur bei extremer Nutzung des Lensshifts k&ouml;nnen sich in Randbereichen Unsch&auml;rfen einschmuggeln, die aber technisch bedingt sind und in der Praxis selten vorkommen.


F&uuml;r die Konvergenz haben wir wieder alle drei Ger&auml;te parallel untersucht. JVC Hat uns verraten, dass die Werkstoleranzen ein halben Pixel Versatz in der Bildmitte und rund einen Pixel in den Randbereichen erlauben. Die Praxis zeigt, dass diese strengen Toleranzen gut eingehalten werden.



Unser erstes Testger&auml;t zeigte lediglich einen minimalen Blauversatz von ca. einem halben Pixel (siehe oben). Dies ist nur aus n&auml;chster N&auml;he auszumachen und st&ouml;rt die Aufl&ouml;sung des Projektors in keiner Weise.



Die anderen zwei Ger&auml;te wiesen einen leichten Versatz von Rot auf, der mit Hilfe der digitalen Konvergenzverschiebung &uuml;ber das gesamte Bild rund einen halben Pixel ausmacht. Auch dies sind f&uuml;r einen 3-Chip FulHD Projektor hervorragende Ergebnisse, deutlich besser, als bei so manchem Konkurrenzmodell.


Und auch in Sachen Ausleuchtung leistet sich der HD1 keine Schw&auml;chen: Selbst zu den Randbereichen ist keine ungleichm&auml;&szlig;ige Ausleuchtung zu erkennen. Auch Desktop-Projektionen (Computernutzung) wirken absolut gleichm&auml;&szlig;ig. Im Schwarz allerdings sind auch bei den Serienger&auml;ten leicht aufgehellte Ecken wahrzunehmen, regelm&auml;&szlig;ige Leser kennen dieses Ph&auml;nomen bereits von den Sony SXRD-Projektoren.


Leicht aufgehellte Ecken in Schwarz

Die Aufhellung der Ecken ist aber so subtil, dass sie im Filmbetrieb nicht auff&auml;llt.



3.7 Overscan (Know How Link hier)

Im Kapitel "Bedienung" sind wir bereits darauf eingegangen: Der HD1 verf&uuml;gt zwar &uuml;ber eine Maskierungs-Funktion, nicht aber &uuml;ber Einstellm&ouml;glichkeiten des Overscans. Hier ist man also von den Werkseinstellungen des Herstellers abh&auml;ngig:


- 1080i/p / 720p

Bei der HD-Zuspielung arbeitet der DLA-HD1 vollkommen frei von Overscan, der gesamte Bildinhalt wird dargestellt, im Falle von 1080p Signalen sogar pixelperfekt.



Mit diesem Ergebnis ist jeder Heimkinofan gl&uuml;cklich, werden doch keine Bildr&auml;nder k&uuml;nstlich abgeschnitten. Bei Bedarf kann mit der "Mask" Funktion ein schwarzer Blanking-Rahmen eingeblendet werden, was in der Praxis jedoch wohl niemand tun wird. Der Vorteil eines Blankings statt Overscan ist bei 1080p Zuspielung die Beibehaltung der pixelgenauen Ansteuerung.


- 576p

Nicht so gut sieht es bei der progressiven PAL (576p) Zuspielung aus. Hier werden rund 25 (PAL)Pixel auf jeder Seite abgeschnitten.


Nicht ver&auml;nderbarer Overscan bei 576p

Zwar macht ein solch leichter Overscan f&uuml;r die Darstellung von Fernseh&uuml;bertragungen Sinn, doch w&auml;re es besser, wenn der Anwender den Overscan selbst bestimmen k&ouml;nnte, wie es bei nahezu jedem Heimkinoprojektor heute der Fall ist.



-576i

Schlichtweg zu gro&szlig; ist letztendlich der Overscan bei herk&ouml;mmlichem PAL, sprich 576i (Interlaced). &Uuml;ber 40 Pixel werden auf jeder Seite abgeschnitten, das sind allein horizontal &uuml;ber 10% des Bildinhaltes.


Zu gro&szlig;er Overscan bei 576i

Besonders st&ouml;rend ist zudem, dass bei Cinemascope-Filmen das 21:9 Format nicht beibehalten wird. Auch dieser Overscan kann beim HD1 nicht beeinflusst werden.


Wer mit dem neuen JVC Beamer stets den gesamten Bildinhalt auf der Leinwand bewundern will, der kommt um eine m&ouml;glichst native HDTV-Zuspielung nicht herum. Es empfehlen sich daher als Zuspieler DVD-Player und Satellitenreceiver, die direkt per eingebauten Scaler 1080i/p ausgeben k&ouml;nnen. In Anbetracht des leistungsf&auml;higen Gennum-Chips im HD1, der im Zweifelsfall eine bessere Skalierung zeigen w&uuml;rde, ist dieses unn&ouml;tige Manko des Overscans unverst&auml;ndlich, in dieser High-End Klasse erstrecht. nahezu jeder Einstiegsprojektor bietet mittlerweile einen variablen Overscan f&uuml;r alle Aufl&ouml;sungen, dies sollte auch hier m&ouml;glich sein.



3.8 De-Interlacing (Know How Link hier)

In Anbetracht des gro&szlig;en Overscans bei 576i-Signalen wird das De-Interlacing schon fast zu einer rein akademischen Frage, zumindest bei PAL. Dennoch haben wir es in gewohnter Ausf&uuml;hrlichkeit untersucht:


Standard Definition (SD) Material

Der Gennum VXP kommt hervorragend mit Videomaterial zu Recht. Nach Motion Adaptive Verfahren verflechtet er zuverl&auml;ssig stehende Bildelemente, w&auml;hrend er bewegte hochinterpoliert. Der Prozessor ist damit auf jeden Fall Sport- & Fernsehtauglich.

Ebenfalls hervorragend arbeitet das Film-Deinterlacing f&uuml;r Spielfilme, die mit 24(25) Bildern pro Sekunde aufgezeichnet sind. Auch mit PAL-Material kommt der Projektor problemlos zurecht und findet zuverl&auml;ssig den richtigen Rhythmus f&uuml;r das Halbbild-Verflechten.


High Definition (HD) Material

F&uuml;r das De-Interlacing von HD (1080i) Material kommt ebenfalls der Gennum mit VXP zum Einsatz. Wir haben wieder das De-Interlacing mit zahlreichen HD-DVDs und Blu-rays bei schwierigen Filmszenen &uuml;berpr&uuml;ft und waren sehr beeindruckt: Dem De-Interlacer gelingt es, auch Filmmaterial hervorragend aufzubereiten und st&ouml;rendes Kantenflimmern zu vermeiden. Selbst schwierigste Szenen blieben auf der Leinwand stabil, Bildfehler sind die absolute Ausnahme. Bisher ist uns kein besseres HD-De-Interlacing begegnet, als mit dem Gennum VXP.

Fehlen tut dem HD1 lediglich ein Reverse Pulldown f&uuml;r die Rekonstruktion der originalen Kinofrequenz von 24Hz bei eingespeistem 1080 / 60Hz Signalen. Das ist schade, denn dazu ist der Gennum Prozessor in der Lage, doch kann man hier dem HD1 keine Vorw&uuml;rfe machen. Kein anderes Modell am Markt (mit Ausnahme des Projection Design 1080) bietet dieses Feature.



3.9 Detailtreue / Skalierung / Sch&auml;rfe (Know How Link hier)

Ebenfalls gute Ergebnisse erwarten wir von den Skalierungsf&auml;higkeiten des HD1 mit seinem Gennum VXP-Prozessor. Nach wie vor ist die Skalierung wichtig, denn herk&ouml;mmliches PAL wird uns noch viele Jahre begleiten.

Horizontal leistet der Gennum hervorragende Dienste, er rechnet die PAL-Aufl&ouml;sung ad&auml;quat um und provoziert auch in schwierigen Frequenzbereichen kaum Interferenzen.


Sehr gute Skalierungseigenschaften
ohne Linearit&auml;tsschwankungen



Auch der Pegelabfall h&ouml;chster Aufl&ouml;sungsbereiche f&auml;llt gering genug aus, um keine Sch&auml;rfeverluste im Bild zu provozieren. Vertikal zeigen sich ebenfalls hervorragende Skalierungsergebnisse.


Auch vertikal kaum Skalierungsartefakte


Selbst einzeilige Details (Screenshot oben) werden absolut frei von Skalierungsartefakten dargestellt. Besser kann eine Skalierung kaum ausfallen, die hohe native FullHD Aufl&ouml;sung des Projektors kommt dem sehr entgegen.


Soweit so gut, bis hierher hat es den Anschein, dass die Skalierungseigenschaften des DLA-HD1 keine W&uuml;nsche offen lassen. Dies gilt auch f&uuml;r analoge Quellen (z.B. YUV), und digitale Zuspielungen &uuml;ber HDMI RGB oder HDMI YPbPr 4:4:4. Bei HDMI YPbPr 4:2:2 fiel uns aber leider ein Chroma-Upsampling-Problem auf:



HDMI 4:2:2 Chroma Upsampling bei 576p/i Material

F&uuml;ttert man den HD1 mit digitalem 576p Material nach 4:2:2 Verfahren kodiert, so muss der Projektor die Chromaaufl&ouml;sung selbst hochrechnen. Hier hat sich ein Fehler eingeschlichen, vertikal werden Spalten vertauscht. Gut kann man das mit Hilfe eines Farb-Multibursts &uuml;berpr&uuml;fen.



Im obigen Screenshot erkennt man die vertikale Streifenbildung, die im Bild st&ouml;rende Artefakte provoziert. Noch deutlicher wird dies bei farbigen schr&auml;gen Kanten:


Fehlerhaftes Chroma-Upsampling


Dieses Ph&auml;nomen ist uns in der Vergangenheit schon &ouml;fter begegnet, wir hatten an entsprechenden Stellen dar&uuml;ber berichtet:

Auch im laufenden Filmbild, besonders bei bunten Szenen, kann der Bildeindruck getr&uuml;bt werden.



Obiger Screenshot zeigt deutlich, wie sich der Chromabug bemerkbar machen kann: Sowohl die blauen als auch roten Konturen zeigen Ausfransungen und sogar Doppelstreifen, die jeweils auf die Spaltenvertauschung zur&uuml;ckzuf&uuml;hren sind.



Auch Buzz Lightyear zeigt deutliche Ausfransungen in Augen- und Kinnpartien. Wie bei vielen Dingen k&ouml;nnen solche Verfremdungen sehr st&ouml;ren, wenn man einmal auf sie aufmerksam geworden ist.


Obiger Detailausschnitt, diesmal aus dem Real-Film "Star Wars",
zeigt ebenfalls die Treppenstufen


Aber es gibt "Workarounds": L&ouml;sung des Problems ist ein Umschalten auf HDMI-RGB bzw. YPbPr 4:4:4. Bei solchen Zuspielungen werden die Farbkan&auml;le einzeln komplett &uuml;bertragen und die st&ouml;renden Bildausfransungen verschwinden.


DVI / HDMI-RGB, keine Ausfransungen


Bei DVD-Playern ist dies also unproblematisch, einfach den Player auf DVI oder HDMI (RGB) umschalten, schon verschwindet das Problem. Doch was ist mit zuk&uuml;nftigen Bildquellen wie Satellit, BluRay oder HD-DVD? Hier ist es noch nicht klar, ob sie alle den RGB Standard &uuml;berhaupt noch unterst&uuml;tzen werden, und auch sie werden f&uuml;r PAL-Material zunehmend eingesetzt werden.


Keine L&ouml;sung gibt es f&uuml;r die Darstellung von digitalen 576i-Signalen, wie sie von manchen DVD-Playern und Receivern ausgegeben werden k&ouml;nnen. Hier scheint der Projektor nur ein Viertel der Aufl&ouml;sung zu verarbeiten, was sich durch grobe Kl&ouml;tzchenbildung &auml;u&szlig;ert:


576i &uuml;ber HDMI, reduzierte Aufl&ouml;sung



Digitale 576i-Signale sind eher die Seltenheit, so dass die fehlerhafte Darstellung in der Praxis nichts ausmachen sollte. Es ist aber schade, dass man so nicht auf die hervorragenden De-Interlacing-Eigenschaften des Gennum zur&uuml;ckgreifen kann. Immerhin k&ouml;nnte dem HD1 ein besseres De-Interlacing gelingen, als so manchem DVD-Player oder Receiver.


In Anbetracht der hohen Preisklasse und des hochwertigen Signalprozessors sollten oben beschriebene Upsampling-Fehler beim HD1 nicht auftauchen. Wir haben die Ingenieure auf diese 576p-Probleme hingewiesen und man versicherte uns, dass an einem Update gearbeitet wird. Sobald dieses erscheint, werden wir dar&uuml;ber berichten.

Doch abgesehen von diesem "Bug" bietet der HD1 in Sachen Skalierung und Detaildarstellung hervorragende Ergebnisse. Die Skalierung ist nahezu frei von Linearit&auml;tsschwankungen, feine Details werden sauber aufgel&ouml;st und angemessen scharf, d.h. nicht k&uuml;nstlich &uuml;bersch&auml;rft, auf die Leinwand gebracht.



3.10 Shading (Know How Link hier)

Die Farbhomogenit&auml;t (Color Uniformity) ist nach wie vor ein gro&szlig;es Thema bei 3-Chip Projektoren und wird es voraussichtlich auch noch f&uuml;r einige Zeit bleiben.

Wie die Erfahrung zeigt, k&ouml;nnen vereinzelt Projektoren besonders viel oder aber auch wenig Shading (Farbwolken) aufweisen. Aus diesem Grund haben wir uns wieder mehrere Serienger&auml;te angesehen, um einen &Uuml;berblick &uuml;ber die Werkstoleranzen zu finden.

Die Ergebnisse sind dabei durchweg gut: Zwar sind in einfl&auml;chigen Graustufen hier rund da leichte Farbtemperaturschwankungen zu erkennen (meist minimal r&ouml;tlich in der rechten Bildh&auml;lfte), doch sind die Toleranzen so gering, dass sie im laufenden Filmbild nicht auffallen. Das Shading der von uns gesichteten Ger&auml;te lag auf einem vorbildlichen Niveau.



3.11 Fazit Bild

In den vorangegangenen Abschnitten haben wir viele Aspekte f&uuml;r sich behandelt. In den meisten Bereichen machte der JVC DLA-HD1 eine sehr gute bis hervorragende Figur. Doch zu was f&uuml;r einem Bildeindruck verhilft all dies dem Projektor, wie tr&auml;gt jeder Aspekt seinen Teil bei?

Wir beginnen mit den Farben, bei denen sich die Geister mancher Heimkinofans (wieder einmal) scheiden werden: Der Farbraum des Projektors wurde nicht stur auf die Videonorm ausgelegt, sondern orientiert sich an dem viel gr&ouml;&szlig;eren Farbraum des Kinooriginals. Mit Kino gibt es nun mal st&auml;rkere und kr&auml;ftigere Farben, als sie unsere Videonormen, die gr&ouml;&szlig;tenteils auf veraltete R&ouml;hrentechnik zur&uuml;ckzuf&uuml;hren sind, erlauben. Die LCOS Technologie bietet aber das Potenzial f&uuml;r kr&auml;ftige Farben, so dass man sie beim HD1 nicht k&uuml;nstlich verschenken wollte. Manche werden hier als Kritik anf&uuml;hren, dass (HD-)DVDs nicht f&uuml;r so einen gro&szlig;en Farbraum gemastert wurden, so ist eine zu kr&auml;ftige Darstellung mancher Farbt&ouml;ne unumg&auml;nglich. Tats&auml;chlich neigt der HD1 auch dazu, Farben sehr kr&auml;ftig darzustellen, dabei gelingt ihm aber dennoch eine sehr glaubw&uuml;rdige Darstellung von Natur- und Gesichtsfarben, die hervorragende Abstimmung der Farbtemperatur tr&auml;gt dazu bei. Der Freund kr&auml;ftiger Farben wird der Kritik entgegnen, dass die Anpassung des Kinooriginals auf den kleinen Videofarbraum von sich schon eine grobe Verfremdung des Originals darstellt und mit akkurater Farbreproduktion nicht allzu viel zu tun hat, die JVC-Variante w&uuml;rde diesem Missstand nur entgegen wirken. Eine allgemeing&uuml;ltige "Weisheit" zu diesem Thema wird es wohl nicht geben. Tatsache ist aber, dass gerade die aktuellen LCOS-Projektoren Farbenvielfalt mit Nat&uuml;rlichkeit beeindruckend kombinieren. Im Falle des DLA-HD1 w&auml;re aber ein Color-Management w&uuml;nschenswert gewesen, so dass der versierte Nutzer selbst Hand anlegen kann, um seine pers&ouml;nlichen W&uuml;nsche zu realisieren. In dieser Preisklasse sind solche Einstellm&ouml;glichkeiten eigentlich Standard.

Zu der sehr ansprechenden Farbdarstellung gesellt sich beim HD1 ein sagenhaft hoher nativer Kontrast von 15000:1, der in der Praxis tats&auml;chlich auch erreicht werden kann. Kein anderer Projektor am Markt hat einen derart hohen nativen Kontrast, so dass der erste Bildeindruck des HD1 auch auf das ge&uuml;bte Auge eine gro&szlig;e Faszination auswirkt. Besonders profitieren &uuml;berwiegend dunkle Szenen mit gleichzeitig hellen Bildelementen. Durch den hohen In-Bild-Kontrast ist der HD1 in solchen Szenen konkurrenzlos. Bei vielen Szenen ist der ANSI-Kontrast weitaus weniger entscheidend, als der native On / Off Kontrast, der HD1 belegt dies auf beeindruckende Weise. Wir werden zu dem Thema bald eine eigene Special-Reihe ver&ouml;ffentlichen.
Durch die sehr gute Gamma-Abstimmung ab Werk gelingt es dem Projektor auch, die unglaubliche Bildtiefe glaubw&uuml;rdig und nat&uuml;rlich auf die Leinwand zu bringen. Allerdings gilt auch hier: Mangelnde Einstellm&ouml;glichkeiten legen den Nutzer auf die Werkseinstellung fest, eigene Optimierungen k&ouml;nnen nicht durchgef&uuml;hrt werden.

Neben obigen Hauptkriterien leistet sich der HD1 auch in vielen Teilaspekten der Bilddarstellung wenig Schw&auml;chen. Besonders sch&ouml;n bei der D-ILA Technik ist das Fehlen jeglicher Digitalartefakte, so dass das Bild auf der Leinwand dem Zelluloid-Original verbl&uuml;ffend nahe kommt. So manche Kleinigkeit st&ouml;rt aber, wie der nicht beeinflussbare Overscan, auch hier h&auml;tten dem Projektor mehr Einstellparameter nicht geschadet. Wirklich st&ouml;rend sind die Unzul&auml;nglichkeiten bei HDMI 576p (YUV) Signalen, der Anwender sollte daher unbedingt darauf achten, dass er RGB-taugliche Zuspieler verwendet.


Kleine Schw&auml;chen hin oder her, der DLA-HD1 beeindruckt mit seiner Bilddarstellung, wie kaum ein Projektor zuvor. Die Kombination aus grandiosen Farben und einmaliger Bildtiefe erzeugen selbst bei jahrelangen Heimkinofans einen AHA-Effekt, wie nie zuvor. Wir durften dies bei mehreren Pr&auml;sentationen des Beamers selbst erfahren. Es gibt wohl niemanden, der dem HD1 kein gutes Bild bescheinigt, und dies ist zuvor praktisch noch keinem anderen Beamer gelungen.




Bewertung Bild gesamt : 1,3 (Sehr Gut -)

Schwarzwert & Kontrast
1,0 (Sehr Gut )

Sch&auml;rfe & Interpolation
(wegen Chromabug)

1,4 - 4,3 (Sehr Gut bis ausreichend)

Farbumfang / -temperatur
1,3 / 1,2 (Sehr gut -)

De-Interlacing
1,6 (Gut +)

Sonstige Aspekte
1,3 (Sehr Gut)


(Alle Bewertungen beziehen sich auf die jeweilige Projektionsart und den aktuellen Stand der Technik. Ein direkter system&uuml;bergreifender Vergleich ist daher nur bedingt m&ouml;glich!)



4. Fazit

Nach den bislang immer eher halbherzigen Versuchen eines Heimkinoprojektors wollte der Hersteller JVC diesmal N&auml;gel mit K&ouml;pfen machen. Ziel war ein Projektor, der in allen Belangen auf die Bed&uuml;rfnisse des Heimkinos angepasst wurde.

Dieses ehrgeizige Vorhaben ist auf ganzer Linie gelungen. Dies beginnt mit der tollen Verarbeitung und dem edlen &Auml;u&szlig;eren, dass dem Kunden direkt das Gef&uuml;hl eines hochwertigen Produktes vermittelt. Leider ist das Finish ein wenig zu empfindlich ausgefallen, es verstaubt und verkratzt sehr leicht.




Beherzigt wurde auch das Bed&uuml;rfnis der Heimkinofans nach Ruhe, denn im Normal Modus verh&auml;lt sich der HD1 angenehm leise und st&ouml;rt den Filmabend in keinster Weise. Nur wer alle Lichtreserven nutzen m&ouml;chte, kommt um eine gewisse Ger&auml;uschunempfindlichkeit nicht herum, denn im High-Modus legt die Bel&uuml;ftung einen Gang zu.


Kompromisslos zeigt sich der Projektor auch in seiner Aufstellungsflexibilit&auml;t: Mit einem sehr gro&szlig;en Zoombereich und einem ebenso gro&szlig;en optischen Lensshift in beide Richtungen ist der HD1 der mit Abstand flexibelste LCSO-Projektor am Markt. Auch ungew&ouml;hnliche Positionen k&ouml;nnen mit ihm problemlos gemeistert werden. Ein wenig schade ist allerdings das Fehlen jeglichen Luxus, so m&uuml;ssen alle Einstellungen manuell vorgenommen werden, wobei der Lensshift zudem ein wenig wackelig wirkt. So mancher Konkurrent bietet in dieser Preisklasse mehr Komfort.


Mit zwei HDMI Eing&auml;ngen und der Unterst&uuml;tzung von 1080p / 24Hz Signalen liegt der HD1 ebenfalls voll im Zeichen der Zeit. Er verarbeitet HDTV-Material zukunftssicher und ist so auf Jahre nutzbar. Kaum ein anderes Modell kann dies derzeit von sich behaupten. Schade ist aber der "Geiz" bei PC-Unterst&uuml;tzungen: Kein analoger VGA Eingang und keinerlei Unterst&uuml;tzung von PC Aufl&ouml;sungen (au&szlig;er VGA) limitieren den Projektor auf reine Videodarstellungen. Immerhin ist es m&ouml;glich, einen PC &uuml;ber HDMI bei passender Aufl&ouml;sung (1920x1080) zu verbinden, doch dazu sind nur Hochleistungsmaschinen derzeit in der Lage, nicht aber das g&auml;ngige Notebook.




&Uuml;ber die resultierende Bildqualit&auml;t ist bereits alles gesagt: Der JVC DLA-HD1 ist ein Projektor, der ein kompromissloses, faszinierendes Bild projiziert, wie kaum ein Ger&auml;t zuvor. Und dies "out of the box", alles ohne gro&szlig;e Nachkorrekturen durch den Nutzer. "Faszinierend" ist rundum das passende Wort, denn Faszination ist jedem ins Gesicht geschrieben, der das Bild des HD1 zum ersten Mal auf der Leinwand betrachtet. Wer das Bild des HD1 in passenden R&auml;umlichkeiten bewundern darf, der verzeiht ihm auch schnell die eine oder andere Unzul&auml;nglichkeit in der Ausstattung.

Daher k&ouml;nnen wir jedem, der sich f&uuml;r das derzeit perfekte Heimkinobild interessiert, einen Besuch beim Fachh&auml;ndler und die damit verbundene pers&ouml;nliche Vorf&uuml;hrung nur empfehlen. Auch Sie werden fasziniert sein, das garantieren wir!


5. Bewertung

+ Full-HDTV Aufl&ouml;sung (1920 x 1080)
+ Hervorragende Werkseinstellungen
+ Einmalig hoher nativer Kontrast
+ Kr&auml;ftige Farben
+ Hochwertige Signalverarbeitung
+ Keine Pixelstruktur
+ Keine digitalen Artefakte
+ Sehr flexible Aufstellungseigenschaften
+ Grandiose Overall-Bildqualit&auml;t
+ Gute Werkstoleranzen


- Chroma Upsampling Error bei 576p/i Signalen (4:2:2)
- Wenig Bildparameter zu pers&ouml;nlichen Optimierung
- Kein motorisierter Zoom, Fokus oder Lens-shift
- Unpr&auml;zise Lens-Shift-Mechanik
- Keine Unterst&uuml;tzung von g&auml;ngigen PC-Aufl&ouml;sungen
- Wenig analoge Eing&auml;nge, kein VGA
- Keine Beeinflussungsm&ouml;glichkeiten f&uuml;r den Overscan



Bewertung gesamt : 1,4 (Sehr Gut -)

Ausstattung
1,7 (Gut +)

Bedienung
1,7 (Gut +)

Technik
1,2 (Sehr Gut)

Bild
1,3 (Sehr Gut -)

Preis Leistung
1,0 (Sehr Gut)


(Alle Bewertungen beziehen sich auf die jeweilige Projektionsart und den aktuellen Stand der Technik. Ein direkter system&uuml;bergreifender Vergleich ist daher nur bedingt m&ouml;glich!)


26. Februar, 2007, Ekkehart Schmitt


Umfrage - Stimmen Sie jetzt ab!!
Mit einem Klick stimmen Sie ab:



-> Ich bevorzuge die wei&szlig;e Version des DLA-HD1... <-



-> Ich bevorzuge die schwarze Version des DLA-HD1... <-



-> Mir ist die Farbe egal... <-




6. Technische Details (Herstellerangaben)

Display device
Full HD D-ILA device

Panel size
0.7 inch x 3 (16:9)

Resolution
1,920 x 1,080 pixels

Lens
X2 manual zoom/focus lens

f=21.3-42.6mm

F=3.2-4.3

Projection size
60 inch – 200 inch

Lens shift function
80% vertical and 34% horizontal

Light source lamp
200-watt ultra high pressure mercury lamp

Light output
700 lm

Contrast ratio
15,000:1

Video Input Terminals
HDMI x 2

Component x 1 (3RCA) can also be used as a RGB terminal.

S Video terminal (mini DIN4 pin) x 1

Composite x 1 (1RCA terminal)

Control Terminals
RS-232 (D-sub9 pin)

Video Input Signals
480i/p, 576i/p, 720p60/50, 1080i60/50, 1080p60/50/24, NTSC/NTSC4.43/PAL/PAL-M/PAL-N/SECAM

Noise level
25dB (in normal mode)

Power Consumption
280-watt (2.7-watt while in stand-by)

Dimensions (W x H x D)
455 x 172 x 418mm (without extrusions)

Mass
11.6kg

Provided accessories
Power source cable x 1, self-lightening remote-control x 1, AAA size batteries, and lens cap







Zur Hauptseite von www.Cine4Home.de  
回覆 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報


發表於 2007-3-2 08:31:42 | 顯示全部樓層
http://www.worldlingo.com/ShaI,a4k9FD6Y3l_Rjysszcp4j9kpXxM4ivVGMVA1Ohk-/translate
德======>>中文
附圖片
回覆 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報


 樓主| 發表於 2007-3-2 09:42:41 | 顯示全部樓層
上面的電腦翻譯中文,看了一段發現頭好痛
回覆 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報


發表於 2007-3-3 18:48:44 | 顯示全部樓層
這台聽說建議售價19萬, 應該實際售價會在低吧!? ^O^!
有Lens shift對我很有吸引力喔!

回覆 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回文 登入 | 註冊

本版積分規則

熱門推薦

HemmaBio器評ISP Elite 和 PA 8 :「一旦你聽過這聲音,就無法回頭」
HemmaBio器評ISP Elite 和
HemmaBio器評ISP Elite 和 PA 8 :「一旦你聽過這聲音,就無法回
Yamaha rx-v663為什麼每次啟動都有這個螢幕? 請益各位前輩們。 謝謝。
Yamaha rx-v663為什麼每次
一次家中的小朋友不知道碰到什麼..... 導致之後每次開機擴大機的
風暴StormAudio 家庭劇院巡禮 : 來自新加坡頂層公寓的聲音饗宴
風暴StormAudio 家庭劇院
風暴StormAudio 家庭劇院巡禮 : 來自新加坡頂層公寓的聲音饗宴
何止錦上添花!?Zidoo Neo Alpha的最佳Wingman - HD Fury Vrroom V3
何止錦上添花!?Zidoo Ne
何止錦上添花!?Zidoo Neo Alpha的最佳Wingman - HD Fury 8K VR
風暴StormAudio/Goldmund家庭劇院巡禮 "KazCorporation:為音樂愛好者實現家庭劇院夢想"
風暴StormAudio/Goldmund
風暴StormAudio/Goldmund家庭劇院巡禮"KazCorporation:為音樂愛

聯絡我們| 問題反映| 小黑屋| 手機版| Archiver|  本網站特別聘請 蔡家豪律師 為本站法律顧問

快速回覆 返回頂部 返回列表